User talk:Bfeddern

Welcome!

Hello, Bfeddern, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Cunard (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Microwave tempering

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Microwave tempering, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-152640574.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:37, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fennemore Craig

A tag has been placed on Fennemore Craig, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ←Signed:→Mr. E. Sánchez ^{Get to know me!} / _{Talk to me!}←at≈:→ 00:24, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Fennemore Craig

Hi. I've nominated Fennemore Craig, an article you worked on, for consideration to appear on the Main Page as part of Wikipedia:Did you know. You can see the hook for the article here, where you can improve it if you see fit. Thanks, Cunard (talk)

Thanks for the DYK

Thanks for the did you know recommendation to Cunard. I made a minor edit to the article by removing revenue mention, as I don't think the information about the firm was accurate. The lawyers mention in the ref were not found on their website. But thank you for adding more info and more references. It was my first real article post. I tried to make it as relevant and comprehensive as possible. Wikipedia Rules! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bfeddern (talk • contribs) 12:51, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! The DYK for Fennemore Craig will appear on the main page at around 19 February 2009 17:21 UTC (you can check the current date and time here). Keep up the good work! Best, Cunard (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, remember to sign posts on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). I've also given you a long overdue welcome message above that has some useful links. Cunard (talk) 05:26, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Fennemore Craig

On February 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Fennemore Craig, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 14:53, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:FC-logo-cities.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:FC-logo-cities.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 10:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Radiant chains (talk) 10:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bfeddern-logo.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Bfeddern-logo.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 05:28, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AprivaPay

The article AprivaPay has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence of notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:53, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Apriva for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Apriva, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apriva until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Timneu22 · talk 20:03, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of AprivaPay for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article AprivaPay, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AprivaPay until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:21, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:30, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comment Thank you. I was in a hurry and didn't realize I was not signed in. Never had to defend an article quite like this before, and forgot to add it in during my hast. Bfeddern (talk) 01:33, 7 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:FC-logo-cities.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:FC-logo-cities.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. TimothyJosephWood 14:03, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]