User talk:Bethnim

Welcome!

So-called "applied" mathematics

I agree with your comments. After all, everything seems to live in $C[0,1]$ ! Cheers,Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 19:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

continuous logic?

Sorry I'm idly browsing, and since you raised the topic: isn't "continuous logic" just another term for "probability theory"? True = probability 1, false = probability 0. Restricting the laws of probability to the domain {0,1} gives the laws of logic Or something like that. Not sure if I'd be able to prove it rigorously without significant time taken on research. --Matt Westwood 17:46, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I reckon continuous probability (e.g. Bayesian logic) is definitely an example of continuous logic. A different example is Fuzzy logic. These two methodologies are compared and combined in the book Fuzzy logic and probability applications: bridging the gap. There are also other systems of logic. I'm glad you asked this question, because browsing Wikipedia just now for articles on logic has enabled me to find the article infinitary logic which is just what I was looking for the other day. Bethnim (talk) 19:30, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, I'll go and research. Thx. --Matt Westwood 22:05, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Future of Future of mathematics

Hi. I am afraid, your article will be deleted (but maybe kept). Anyway, what about doing the same (or better) in Citizendium? Boris Tsirelson (talk) 19:38, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Boris. Thanks for the suggestion. Bethnim (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

TuHan-Bot

Thank you for your re-correction.--Tranletuhan (talk) 10:31, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ring of periods

Hello Bethnim, you are correct, the origin was not the bot but a mistake on cawiki ... bots may spread human errors! I have corrected the error in cawiki in order to prevent any other bot will repeat the error ... Thanks for your advice.--Loupeter (talk) 14:37, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have marked you as a reviewer

I have added the "reviewers" property to your user account. This property is related to the Pending changes system that is currently being tried. This system loosens page protection by allowing anonymous users to make "pending" changes which don't become "live" until they're "reviewed". However, logged-in users always see the very latest version of each page with no delay. A good explanation of the system is given in this image. The system is only being used for pages that would otherwise be protected from editing.

If there are "pending" (unreviewed) edits for a page, they will be apparent in a page's history screen; you do not have to go looking for them. There is, however, a list of all articles with changes awaiting review at Special:OldReviewedPages. Because there are so few pages in the trial so far, the latter list is almost always empty. The list of all pages in the pending review system is at Special:StablePages.

To use the system, you can simply edit the page as you normally would, but you should also mark the latest revision as "reviewed" if you have looked at it to ensure it isn't problematic. Edits should generally be accepted if you wouldn't undo them in normal editing: they don't have obvious vandalism, personal attacks, etc. If an edit is problematic, you can fix it by editing or undoing it, just like normal. You are permitted to mark your own changes as reviewed.

The "reviewers" property does not obligate you to do any additional work, and if you like you can simply ignore it. The expectation is that many users will have this property, so that they can review pending revisions in the course of normal editing. However, if you explicitly want to decline the "reviewer" property, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:33, 18 June 2010 (UTC) — Carl (CBM · talk) 13:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Help Request

Hi, I'm new to Wikipedia, and I have written a few pages on exciting and highly relevant Mathematical topics that I would like to put up. Before doing this though, I would love to have some criticism and feedback from experienced people who have done this before. Would you be so kind as to help me with this? Please have a look here: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Hh73wiki Choose an article from my personal sandbox that looks intriguing, and let me know what you think on the discussion page! Thanks! Hh73wiki (talk) 18:58, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merger of symbolic computation with computer algebra system

You may be interested in Talk:Symbolic computation#Merger with computer algebra system. Yaris678 (talk) 17:05, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

continuous graph, edge density

Hi, could you please have a look here? Talk:Continuous_graph Thank you. 80.98.158.189 (talk) 22:28, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]