User talk:Beteskiller

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet of Beteskilla (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log). Blocked or banned users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; if you are banned, all edits under this account may be reverted.

If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beteskiller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How did this happen? why did they block me? What's a sockpuppet?

Decline reason:

In order: FisherQueen, because you're a sockpuppet, *points up at the link above that describes sockpuppets*. Declined. Syrthiss (talk) 14:14, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beteskiller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don't really understand what's going on here? im blocked right? but why? I dont even know what a sockpuppet is... I dont understand what i did to get banned

Decline reason:

If you look like a duck and quack like a duck, you're probably a duck. TN X Man 15:50, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You commented on FisherQueen's talk page saying that you didn't think that Beteskilla should be blocked. Your username is essentially the same. While there is the possibility that you aren't the same user evading the block, its unlikely to me. Ergo, you are blocked. Syrthiss (talk) 14:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I note that, since User:Beteskilla's edit history contains almost nothing but vandalism, no reasonable person could review that history and come to the conclusion that the block was, as you put it, "absurd"- except the blocked user herself. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beteskiller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I said abserd becuase I thought it wuz. Beteskilla had ben unblocked becauze he ment it, and than u blocked him becauze he made a coment on fisherqueens paje. He waznt vandalising any paje, just leveing a coment on her paje. And i wuz just comenting on it two. I didnt saye anything mene or rong, just what i thout, and u blocked me. U evin sed, I maye not be beteskilla, but just becauz our naims are alike, u blocked me, and thatz not fare at all

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Syrthiss (talk) 13:15, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Why are you suddenly spelling badly? You don't write this badly in your other communications. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 14:22, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beteskiller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia

As I had said, this block is NOT necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia. This is because I havent't made any edits to any pages other than the comment I left on Fisherqueen's page. I haven't made ANY vandalisms whatsoever and I find this block unjust. There is no evidence to support that there will be any unconstructive edits made from my account, other than the fact that my name is basically the same as Beteskilla, whose page I have looked at, and have seen what a regular, common wikie-criminal looks like. And, that, my friends, is no reason to deny a man's rights to freedom of speech

Decline reason:

Whether you affect a semi-literate style or not, you are still a block-evading sockpuppet. --Anthony.bradbury^"talk" 23:17, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's better. But why were you pretending to be a bad speller? Were you trying to assume a different writing style from your other account? And are you seriously claiming that you are not User:Beteskilla, do not know User:Beteskilla, and happened purely by coincidence to notice his block and feel strongly that this poor stranger, whose edits are all vandalism and insults, had been treated unfairly? Because that seems really really improbable; I can come up with a better fiction for you, if you need help. Try this one: He's your naughty little brother, who mimicked your username because he admires you, and that's why you feel sympathy for him. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:50, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beteskiller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

That's a good one. I shouldve thought of that first... But on a serious note, I just ask that I PLEASE be unblocked. Theres no particular reason that I need to be unblocked, but on the other hand, I believe there is no reason why I need to be blocked. ANd as for the nad spelling, I was just being silly. That just goes to show how innocent I am and that i mean no harm :)

Decline reason:

You still don't understand why you're blocked don't you. See WP:SOCK. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.