User talk:Bessex

Kathy Barnette

I feel that you shouldn't exclude her wiki. Especially if she running for office. Please lwt rectify this and fix it. Please.

pro wrestling moves

I feel that we should restore pro wrestlers moves set in their entry because ehen people read up on the wrestlers theywant to know what their moves set signatures moves and finishing move is. It just as important as their titles they ein.

Immortal Man

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created. It is considered vandalism. janejellyroll 07:04, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The essex blog

A tag has been placed on The essex blog requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of pBold texteople, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rent A Troop (talk) 14:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added to the page Chiefsplanet do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jminthorne (talk) 07:09, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tina Fey, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jack Merridew 11:10, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Tina Fey, you may be blocked from editing. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 06:13, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to Nikki Haley, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dougweller (talk) 05:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. When you make a change to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Nikki Haley. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit. It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. and other articles - you must use these. These are a vital part of thecommunications with other editors that is vital to a collaborative exercise. I see you also have not commented on any of the warnings. You are going to end up blocked if you don't start communicating and stop your unexplained deletions. Dougweller (talk) 05:53, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:53, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Sonja Schmidt

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Sonja Schmidt, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.pjtv.com/?cmd=mpg&mpid=88.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:41, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sonja Schmidt

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sonja Schmidt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. E. Fokker (talk) 19:42, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Sonja Schmidt, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a {{hangon}} tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 20:00, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Sonja Schmidt. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. E. Fokker (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

March 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bzuk (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

April 2013

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Palmer, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Blackguard 21:33, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

William La Jeunesse

Hello Bessex,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, William La Jeunesse, may be copied from http://foxnewsinsider.com/people/william-la-jeunesse. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 12:14, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of William La Jeunesse

Hello Bessex,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged William La Jeunesse for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Crispulop (talk) 13:08, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

You wrote:

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --Bessex (talk) 14:05, 9 August 2013 (UTC) didn't use a copy and paste of the fox news bio i used info i gathered on my own like year of birth and where he was born and went to high school. So i feel that did it in my own words and have not seen the fox news bio of him.

Assuming as much good faith as should be assumed, this is either disingenuous or naive. The article is a straightforward copyright violation. Feel free to ask me for help if you would like to re-start it.--Shirt58 (talk) 15:00, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

September 2015

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Dean Ambrose— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 16:44, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bessex! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, professional wrestlers, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Bessex! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Herman Cain, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)