User talk:Bernardosilvabeck

Welcome!

Hello, Bernardosilvabeck, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Fundo Mamacona, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drmies (talk) 22:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Drmies (talk) 22:38, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, this is the English Wikipedia. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 22:39, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your article Fundo Mamacona

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Fundo Mamacona to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Wgolf (talk) 22:44, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's still a copyright violation. You can't copy stuff and paste it in here. I removed it again; next time I will have no choice but to block you. Drmies (talk) 00:22, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fundo Mamacona

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Fundo Mamacona requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mincetur.gob.pe/TURISMO/OTROS/inventario%20turistico/Ficha.asp?cod_Ficha=2794. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Wgolf (talk) 00:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted this as spam--it is advertising. Drmies (talk) 03:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 03:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bernardosilvabeck (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've been blocked by Drmies ( https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/User:Drmies) without a reason and no infringement of Wikipedia's regulations, 2 Articles where added to Wikipedia today, 1 referring to a historical place (tourist complex)in Lima-Peru which has within the historical national landmark of an ancient House, then, the second articles referring to that house, Hacianda Mamacona. This places are historical and of grate importance, i stongly believe that by doing this i am assuring later dubiously interested people/companies called similarly cant use those names to take advantage or missus them, while at the same time give the precise and relevant information about both of them, citing them accordingly and providing a magnificent unpublished photograph. Furthermore, I would like to assure that these 2 or at least 1 (Fundo Mamacona) article will leave a clear record about the correct information and citations about the place and Historical Landmark, even Wikipedia copyright check gave a false-positive on the information provided. Which has now been fixed due to the first Article. The soul purpose of an encyclopedia is to maintain history and facts as true as possible. We are sorry there has been a misunderstanding. Please reconsider, Regards.

Of course I assure I guarantee that the next version will not be promotional or even look like it. Nevertheless I would like to have help before I publish the article. Having you or any other admin check the article before publishing to verify it is meets Wikipedia standards. Thanks for the help, BS.Bernardosilvabeck (talk) 03:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Wikipedia is not a promotional vehicle. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

The translated version made it clear that you were here to advertise. Sorry. Drmies (talk) 03:28, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

there was no translated version, it was only 1 in English, and on spanish it would have been exactly the same...???Bernardosilvabeck (talk) 03:47, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to place each new reply in a new unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:39, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bernardo, the last one I deleted was translated into English. No need to email me: what you need to do to get unblocked is guarantee that the next version of the text will not be promotional, that it will have reliable sources that indicate the subject is notable by our standards (WP:GNG, and that you will abide by our guidelines. The next admin will decide. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:45, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Of course I assure I guarantee that the next version will not be promotional or even look like it. Nevertheless I would like to have help before I publish the article. Having you or any other admin check the article before publishing to verify it is meets Wikipedia standards. Thanks for the help, BS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bernardosilvab (talk • contribs) 17:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]