User talk:Cityboyben

Welcome

Welcome to my talk page, not that I really expect anyone to use this all to much, as I only edit Wikipedia infrequently. However I will reply on my talk page to any comments, unless you ask me that I reply elsewhere. Benny45boy 12:05, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Hello, Cityboyben, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Addhoc 12:58, 22 September 2006 (UTC) ur cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:08, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

redirect / move problem

Hi. Offhand it looks nice that you are fixing up articles about U.S. presidential offices.

I note your redirect of Old Executive Office Building to Eisenhower Executive Office Building. It looks like the article has been moved back and forth before. I don't have any opinion on which is the best name, but perhaps it should be discussed at the Talk page of the article, because there has been apparently different opinions previously, before moving abruptly.

Also, your move and redirect seems to have been done by cut-and-paste, which loses the edit history of the article. And, it separated the Talk page discussion, which is now sitting there as a Talk page for the redirect.

Perhaps you are not yet aware of the wp:RM requested move service. You can there suggest a move, and, perhaps after some discussion, an administrator will close the discussion implement the move, handling any complications with edit histories and talk pages. I encourage you to try it in the future. Also, for this one, I will list the problem there, because it needs to be fixed. Perhaps your move should be Undone, and discussion about the move opened, as next steps, but I'll just mention it first. Please check wp:RM for the notice there, shortly. doncram (talk) 19:34, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did post something at wp:RM, but upon further thought, I decided it best to undo your cut-and-paste + redirect. Please follow the process for requesting a move, for handling discussion notice, and so on, at wp:RM. Again, I don't have any strong opinion about which is the best name, but the move needs to be handled properly. doncram (talk) 20:06, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Disagreement over White House Office and Executive Office of the President articles

Hi. I have stated my opinion concerning the ordering of the Chief of Staff's Office on the White House Office page, and the White House Office on the Executive Office of the President page, on the 'talk pages' of those respective articles. Please consult these pages. VanCity99 (talk) 10:49, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Counselor to the President Article

Since you are a frequent contributor to articles relating to the United States Government, and previously contributed to the Counselor to the President article, I wanted to let you know about a question I have raised concerning that article. For more information, see the article's Talk page for details. --TommyBoy (talk) 22:50, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing your thoughts on this matter, I have updated the article accordingly. --TommyBoy (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

EOP Agencies

Greetings, I've noticed you removed a few agencies from Executive Office of the President of the United States including the National Economic Council. Are these no longer part of the EOP? Poshzombie (talk) 18:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Actually as far as I can tell they never were part of the EOP but in fact fall under the Office of White House Policy (or Office of Policy Development) which is part of the White House Office, apologies if I didn't adequately explain it enough. Benny45boy (talk) 20:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That clears it up, thanks.Poshzombie (talk) 00:31, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to join WikiProject United States

Hello, Cityboyben! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 02:31, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Generated Image of new N97.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Generated Image of new N97.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 13:37, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Benny45boy. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:WHC

Template:WHC has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 19:37, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]