User talk:Benjamin au

December 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to The Zeitgeist Movement, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Zeitgeist Movement, this article was deleted per this deletion discussion. Cannolis (talk) 11:55, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at The Zeitgeist Movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Gain consensus on the article's talk page, to recreate said article. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at The Zeitgeist Movement. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Don't edit war. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:23, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --MONGO 12:52, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Benjamin_au reported by User:MelbourneStar (Result: ). Thank you. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 12:27, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]