User talk:BenjaminShoe8
Hello, I am here in defense of myself. A claim has been made that my account is an alternate account of an individual making an attempt to edit the Willard, Missouri Wikipedia page. My account is not an alternate account. I am willing to do what I must to prove that this account is not affiliated with other accounts that have been banned from editing the Willard, Missouri page. I'm unsure if I am reporting this error correctly as I do not often utilize my Wikipedia account. Please contact me so that this issue can be resolved.
BenjaminShoe8 (talk) 14:49, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
BenjaminShoe8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Hello, I am here in defense of myself. A claim has been made that my account is an alternate account of an individual making an attempt to edit the Willard, Missouri Wikipedia page. My account is not an alternate account. I am willing to do what I must to prove that this account is not affiliated with other accounts that have been banned from editing the Willard, Missouri page. I'm unsure if I am reporting this error correctly as I do not often utilize my Wikipedia account. Please contact me so that this issue can be resolved.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 15:28, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- I'd be curious to know (as a non-admin) how your account, which is 3 years old and had only 1 edit until today, suddenly returned to repeatedly restore contested content for a non-notable individual. Praxidicae (talk) 15:05, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
- And I'll also note that the account which created the draft of the person the accounts blocked in relation to yours, has requested an unblock and noted that they're on a school address. I'd like to point out to you both that meat puppetry is the same as abusing multiple accounts and Wikipedia does not allow that. Praxidicae (talk) 15:07, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
(edit conflict) You made one edit two and a half years ago, then did not edit until your recent edits to the Willard, Missouri article. The other three accounts named in the SPI were all created much sooner and editing about the same subject matter. Please explain this as well as any connection you have to Bradley Thomas Cooper. 331dot (talk) 15:06, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
BenjaminShoe8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
In response, I made this account roughly three years ago for no particular reason and did not use it often. I was able to remember the credentials as they are still the ones I utilize to this day. I know Bradley Thomas Cooper personally and think his accomplishments are quite extraordinary for his young age. I was aware that other people had been making an attempt to add him to the Willard, Missouri page and decided that by involving myself, I would make myself available for others to speak to me giving me an opportunity to respond in defense of Mr. Cooper. I believe that his accomplishments are large enough to warrant a position as a Notable Person on the Willard, Missouri Wikipedia page. He has worked and volunteered for several politicians and offices over the course of the last four or five years and at least two news articles have been written regarding his activism towards his passion: politics. Whether or not you or I agree with all of his opinions (I don't) is not even a factor. He has done more for his cause than most people twice his age.
Decline reason:
Based on a combination of checkuser and behavioral evidence, I'm declining this request. PhilKnight (talk) 19:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Note to reviewing admin: not only did Jpgordon indicate these CU blocked now, immediately following several unblock requests for four of these accounts, a fifth popped up inserting the same thing, again. Praxidicae (talk) 16:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)