User talk:Benjamin5152414

Welcome!

Hello, Benjamin5152414! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 15:57, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

please stop thrusting your political and ideological nonsense onto original topics. if you're unfamiliar with humanism, Sagan, etc., I recommend you make arguments that refute the topic. as it stands, you're basing your objections on your own opinions and experiences - but with no facts to support your edit-war.

Why don't you begin an edit-war conflict resolution with the wikipedia foundation? see who wins. but this is not the way to manage wikipedia entries, what you're doing. The page, Libertarian_humanism is simply based on the ideal of rejection of Joseph Stalin's state-sponsored pograms and how atheism is being touted as a humanist point-of-view. The opposing view would of course be more liberal, and not rigid and conservative as atheism - under atheism, there can be no doubt that, no matter how small, there's a chance that there might be something that humanity might consider, "god-like".

But atheism is "no gods" - which, in itself, is an unscientific opinion not based on observation (we can't examine the multi/verse.)e

So, seriously... stop making a mockery of Wikipedia by trying to play Thought_Police. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xan81 (talk • contribs) 00:32, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not the person thrusting ideological nonsense into Wikipedia. I am trying to clean up the page, not starting an edit war. Benjamin5152414 (talk) 17:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV

I noticed your edit at Gavin McInnes and had to make some changes to comply with WP:NPOV. I see that you've already been confronted about this issue so I'd like to more-fully explain. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view based upon source material. In cases where either the source material is biased or you have a bias, we have to take steps to prevent that bias from infecting the article. MediaMatters is a leftist outfit so what they say about a libertarian or conservative has to be couched in those terms. Especially when dealing with a biography about a living person, we have to be circumspect and make every effort to stick to the facts based upon sources. When you diverge from NPOV or WP:V, the community of editors will judge that you're no longer a good-faith contributor and sanctions may result in order to protect the integrity of the project. We value contributions but only so long as they are constructive in nature. The more careful you can be in dealing with content the better our encyclopedia will be. Feel free to ask if you have questions. Chris Troutman (talk) 05:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please take note of the person who previously "confronted" me about the issue of neutrality. The person has been repeatably called out for edit warring and disruptive editing, including deleting entire articles. I am not aware of Media Matters being an unreliable source, but I know see there is some debate over whether it is or not. Still, the fact that Gavin McInnes wrote for VDARE isn't contentious and neither is the fact that it is a white nationalist site. If I was trying to include my own POV, I would have specifically labeled McGinnes a white nationalist and a racist and maybe something else. But I didn't, and I wouldn't do so without proper citations. Benjamin5152414 (talk) 05:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are a far-left anarchist nutjob who sucks donkey balls. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:6000:FD22:7600:1936:B1B8:D407:60C (talk) 09:26, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Lokteff

Please refrain from mislabeling people. White nationalists are not white supremacists. That's why they are two different labels. Calling someone "racist" is a meaningless slur. You're racist. See how that doesn't change or mean a thing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hansnarf (talk • contribs) 19:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lana Lokteff has been verified as a white supremacist and a white nationalist by the references. If she wasn't a racist she wouldn't be a white supremacist or a white nationalist. Saying "calling some 'racist' is a meaningless slur" is meaningless when you defend people like Lana Lokfoett from charges of racism. Benjamin5152414 (talk) 22:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Benjamin5152414. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]