User talk:Benet Allen

Hi Benet Allen!

Welcome!

Hello Benet Allen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

My reply from the Channel Tunnel talk page:

The paragraph reads -

Second tunnel

As of 2005, the British and French governments are investigating the possibility of a second tunnel through the Channel. While no planning has progressed past its feasibility, it is possible that such a project might be a single (wider or taller) tube as tunnel boring technology has progressed significantly over the past two decades.

The governments are bound by the original Treaty to investigate the possibility; they will do nothing and no tunnel will be built. But the para is not inaccurate. If you can point me at the innaccuracy in the para, I'll correct it from primary source documents. ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 20:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply. The governments are indeed bound by the original Treaty to investigate the possibility; that they will do nothing and no tunnel will be built is well known within the rail industry but you'd have trouble finding a source to cite making that official and thus useful for the purposes of an encyclopedia. ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 19:11, 21 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! You seem to assume that I wrote the Channel Tunnel article, or at least the paragraph about the second tunnel. You are mistaken - whilst I know a lot about the subject (I'm a regular user of the tunnel) and have the article on my watchlist due to its habit of being vandalised by the BNP, I've not written any part of it - just reverted vandalism.

I agree that the paragraph in question could be seen as misleading; but there is no other way of putting it without using weasel words like "many analysts believe...". I've done a thorough search of Google and can find nothing offical to cite that will confirm what everybody in the industry knows in their bones: the second tunnel will not happen.

Because the Treaty requires Eurotunnel plc to provide plans for a second tunnel and also requires the two governments to consider those plans and find someone else to produce those plans if the Eurotunnel plans are unacceptable, neither government is going to admit that the second tunnel won't happen - it's diplomatically difficult to be the first government to admit it as the other will, invariably, point the finger and blame the government that cancels it, whilst being relieved that it was cancelled.

If you're really unhappy with the paragraph, then I suggest that you be bold! and change it. But I guarentee that you won't find a source to cite and you will have to resort to weasel words. But good luck in trying! ➨ ❝R E DVERS❞ 15:34, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you take a look at this section [1]. I wrote it but my source was one RN cadet training manual and one website, here [2] (to jog my memory). Your edits/suggestions are welcomed for obvious reasons.--ChrisJMoor 02:48, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User:Clawed has raised an issue regarding the disclaimer given on the Helicopter Pilotage and Hawker Siddeley Harrier pages. You can see our dialogue on his user page. Do you think the disclaimer is worth keeping?

Railway Signalling

Hello, I've replied to your comments on Railway Signalling at my talk page. We can carry on the conversation there, but wanted to let you know I've replied in the event you're not watching my page. Regards. — JonRoma 19:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Reuters logo.gif

Hello, Benet Allen. An automated process has found and removed an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, and thus is being used under fair use that was in your userspace. The image (Image:Reuters logo.gif) was found at the following location: User:Benet Allen. This image or media was attempted to be removed per criterion number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media was replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. Please find a free image or media to replace it with, and or remove the image from your userspace. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 08:22, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

London Meetup - January 12, 2008

Hi! There's going to be a London Wikipedia Meetup coming Saturday January 12, 2008. If you are interested in coming along take part in the discussion over a Wikipedia:Meetup/London7. The discussion is going on until tomorrow evening and the official location and time will be published at the same page late Thursday or early Friday. Hope to see you Saturday, Poeloq (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to Wikipedia meetup in London

Wikimedia UK logo

Date: 13:00 onwards, Sunday 10 August 2008

Venue: Penderel's Oak pub, Holborn WC1 map

More information: Wikipedia:Meetup/London 12

Hello,

I noticed that you have listed yourself as a Wikipedian in London, so I thought you might like to come to one of our monthly social meetups. The next one is going to be on Sunday 10 August, which might well be rather short notice, but if you can't come this time, we try to have one every second Sunday of the month.

If you haven't been before, these meetups are mainly casual social events for Wikipedia enthusiasts in which we chat about Wikipedia and any other topics we fancy. It's a great way to meet some very keen Wikipedians, but we'd also love for you to come along if you're interested in finding out more about Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, or other collaborative wiki projects too.

The location is a pub that is quite quiet and family friendly on a Sunday lunchtime, so hopefully younger Wikipedians will also feel welcome and safe. Alcohol consumption is certainly not required!

Although the meetups are popular, many UK-based editors still don't know about them. It would be great to welcome some fresh faces, so I hope you can come along.

Yours,

James F. (talk) 09:27, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please forgive the slightly impersonal mass-invite!

London Wikimedia Fundraiser

Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://twiki.riteme.site/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.

Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 18:05, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Faithless/Rollo

Couldn't help but notice that your picture added to Rollo from Faithless's page was not actually of Rollo, could you change it or take it down? — Preceding unsigned comment added by C0st3ll0 (talk • contribs) 14:51, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London

For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you!

All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 15:08, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Helicopters

Belated reply to your comment of 18:15, 24 December 2005...

Thanks mate. Happy to chat re helicopter details any time, and if there's any info I can help with after making simulators for a couple of brands (AW139, EC135) then come chat.

I used to know what every switch and circuit breaker did. Ojw (talk) 22:05, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Benet Allen (June 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Benet Allen/Benet Allen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Benet Allen/Benet Allen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 16:59, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Benet Allen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 16:59, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. KGirl ^{(Wanna chat?)} 16:59, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:R22-DI.jpg

The file File:R22-DI.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Benet Allen/Benet Allen

Hello, Benet Allen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Benet Allen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (📧) 16:59, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]