User talk:BeneficialApartheidAdvocate

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (BeneficialApartheidAdvocate) may not meet Wikipedia's username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account to use for editing. Thank you. Ravenswing 07:16, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ain't how it works, sonny. You make the case to which I then might reply. Not me anticipating all possible cases on the basis of unreasoned allegation.BeneficialApartheidAdvocate (talk) 22:46, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It shouldn't be difficult to perceive that your user name might be offensive to South African editors, in particular, and to non-Caucasians generally. I reiterate my recommendation that you make arrangements to change it, using the link above, or to simply abandon it and come up with a new one that isn't so provocative. Ravenswing 07:43, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

March 2012

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Hut 8.5 12:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's how it works ... sport. Heaven knows what you get out of this petty serial sockpuppetry, but have you noticed that we just shrug and keep on with our usual editing and improvements, and that your disruption never lasts? Ravenswing 18:45, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]