User talk:Benedict Broere
February 2013
[edit]
Hello, I'm Excirial. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Huub Kortekaas, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 22:00, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Huub Kortekaas was changed by Benedict Broere (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.929571 on 2013-02-14T22:05:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:05, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
Hello Excirial, Concerning the Huub Kortekaas page, an explanation is added. The intention is actually to completely remove the page while it will be replaced by a new Huub en Adelheid Kortekaas wikipage. The Dutch version is already realised and under construction. An Enlish version is worked on. Regards, Benedict Broere — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benedict Broere (talk • contribs) 22:14, 14 February 2013 (UTC)
- Working on a new version for a page is of course just fine, but blanking an existing page while working on a new version is not. For comparison, suppose that a group of editors would decide to rewrite the World War II article. Would blanking the existing article while it was being worked on sound like a good idea? Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 22:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)