User talk:Benbradleyhubby

April 2011

Thank you for your recent contributions, such as House of Grayson. Getting started creating new articles on Wikipedia can be tricky, and you might like to try creating a draft version first, which you can then ask for feedback on if necessary, without the risk of speedy deletion. Do make sure you also read help available to you, including Your First Article and the Tutorial. You might also like to try the Article Wizard, which has an option to create a draft version. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from House of Grayson. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 23:31, 23 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to House of Grayson, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 00:11, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to House of Grayson, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered disruptive editing. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Eeekster (talk) 00:16, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove the maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at House of Grayson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Is there any reason for you to keep removing the uncatagorized tag? Eeekster (talk) 00:20, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for repeated removal of an "uncategorised" tag, with no attempt to explain your reason, despite several warnings. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. JamesBWatson (talk) 00:33, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at House of Grayson, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. There is no evidence anywhere that the subject of the article exists, so the article has been deleted as a hoax. Please make sure that you create articles only on subjects for which you can provide references to reliable sources. JamesBWatson (talk) 00:41, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Jjwilliams98 (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Catfish Jim & the soapdish 08:58, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]