Jump to content

User talk:BenStuartCohen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

January 2008

[edit]

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, which wasn't included with your recent edit to Andy Warhol. Thank you. freshacconcispeaktome 18:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply/Warhol

[edit]

There are procedures involved with including new information. Why not bring it to the Warhol talk page to get some feedback from other editors? This sort of info needs context--who was this other artist? what connection does he have to Warhol? It does not belong in the Warhol article, at least not at that early point. Starting an edit war is not the right way to go about these things. Two editors reverted your edits. This means that there is a dispute to the information. Bring it to the Warhol talk page and let others weigh in. Thank you. freshacconcispeaktome 19:38, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome

[edit]

Welcome...

Hello, BenStuartCohen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Freshacconci

Again, welcome! freshacconcispeaktome 22:24, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guide to referencing

[edit]

Click on "show" to open contents.


Dave Clark Five

[edit]

Are you certain that it is appropriate to include www.daveclarkfive.com as a link on the page? I had originally deleted it because it seems to be more about Mike Smith and contains little beyond a portrait of Smith and a comment from his widow Charlie. The fact that you may own the site name doesn't necessarily make it relevant to the Dave Clark Five page, without more, in my view. The two linked fansites contain much more band-related content.

Dreadarthur (talk) 04:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your recent edited inclusion of a link to the above mentioned website. Dreadarthur's comments seem to me more than reasonable, but, more to the point, a link to the self same article is already included in the Dave Clark Five article. More than enough, surely.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 22:02, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]