User talk:BenRussell
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
[edit]
I notice that you are part of Category:Inclusionist_Wikipedians. I would like you to consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles for deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia.
Ikip (talk) 00:39, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to the Article Rescue Squad
[edit]
Hi, BenRussell, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!
If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you. And once again - Welcome! -- Banjeboi 19:49, 13 April 2009 (UTC) | |||||||
The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)
[edit]| The Wikipedia:Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content | |||||
Thank you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thank you for your excellent re-write of the National Federation of Republican Assemblies article CorpITGuy (talk) 16:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC) |
AfD nomination of List of longest-lasting empires
[edit]
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of longest-lasting empires. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of longest-lasting empires (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.
Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- I read the comments you left at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of longest-lasting empires (2nd nomination)...
- Would you like a copy of this article in your userspace? -- Ϫ 22:15, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Yes. Thank you! BenRussell (talk) 05:15, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
| ||||
Content
glad to see this page back
[edit]I was upset to see the List of longest lasting empires page deleted. Glad to see it might have a place.
Facesnorth (talk) 19:15, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
Final discussion for Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
[edit]Hello, I note that you have commented on the first phase of Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Biographies of living people
As this RFC closes, there are two proposals being considered:
- Proposal to Close This RfC
- Alternate proposal to close this RFC: we don't need a whole new layer of bureaucracy
Your opinion on this is welcome. Okip 02:08, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Rescue
[edit]Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Armageddon theology WritersCramp (talk) 12:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
WikiProject Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
[edit]
| |||
Orphaned non-free image File:NFRA Logo.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:NFRA Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:20, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
