User talk:Beltline

This user rescues articles for the Article Rescue Squadron.

Welcome

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Grade sources • Cite sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists • Best articles Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Pages needing attention • Peer review The missing manual

Thanks

Thanks for adding {{oldprodfull}} to the various articles I deprodded today. I do normally go back and add the tag myself, but you doing so saved me some time so thanks for that. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, but I was not just tagging your deprods; I am doing it for all the oldprods that I come across. Do you know if there are any bots that can help with this task? Beltline (talk) 23:23, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did realize you were doing it for all of the ones from the last day, so "thanks" on behalf of those people too. :)

There isn't currently a bot that does the job, but I was definitely considering writing one as soon as a I finished up a couple other programming projects I am working on currently. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:26, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there an archive, or listing anywhere, of all articles that have been prodded in the past? Beltline (talk) 23:38, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not that I know of. --ThaddeusB (talk) 23:50, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"Contested" prod of European Parliament election, 2014 (United Kingdom)

Hi. You recently removed a prod tag from the above article, labelling it as "previously contested". However, if you look at the actual edit (including summary) that first removed the prod tag, it seems clear that the editor in question agreed that the article was inappropriate, as did the subsequent one. WP:CONTESTED is fairly clear about situations like that: it is OK to restore a prod tag that was clearly removed in error, or in support of an even speedier deletion. And as near as I can tell, neither the original creator nor anyone else has expressed an opinion that the article should be kept. So unless you yourself want to contest the prod (as is of course your right), I would appreciate it if you undid your last edit, to save everyone the effort of a pointless AfD. Thanks, Hqb (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion of the article is not uncontroversial. Beltline (talk) 21:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azviz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. MuZemike 05:24, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand this. Beltline (talk) 17:57, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for expanding the { {oldprodfull}} template

Seems to be a quite cumbersome work, and I hope you can find means to automate it. Power.corrupts (talk) 20:51, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michoel Schnitzler

Thank you for finding a source for Michoel's notability. I removed it as it is talking about a very different person. The article is a bout a Chassidic Jewish music artist while the source you found was for a chamber musician. I'd love to keep the article as I feel he is notable to a good segment of the Jewish population but I'm not sure how to source that.

Joe407 (talk) 06:04, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- You seem to have confused two namesake persons in your decline of a PROD, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michoel Schnitzler. best Power.corrupts (talk) 16:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry so late in saying welcome!

I am really glad that you added the Article rescue squadron template to your user page.

Please take a minute to sign your name to our list of 270+ members:

Wikipedia:ARSM#All_Members

Good news, we are building our first newsletter and should sent out this weekend, keep an eye out for it!

And a warm welcome to the squadron!

Articles tagged for deletion and rescue
Category Articles tagged for deletion and rescue not found

Hi, Beltline, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome! Ikip (talk) 21:06, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

oldprodfull - I never nom'd the article for deletion.

I rolled back this edit http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jorja_Fox&oldid=298225146 - Someone asked me (off WikiPedia) why I nominated this for deletion. Never did it. I am 100% sure of this. Hell, I wasn't even active on WikiPedia then. So ... yeah. No idea what happened here. -- Ipstenu (talk • contribs) 16:50, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lauri Kyöstilä

The article Lauri Kyöstilä has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Avilich (talk) 16:44, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]