User talk:BelfastBrooks

This is BelfastBrooks's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

BelfastBrooks, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi BelfastBrooks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Nick Moyes (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:15, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

December 2020[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Hainanese chicken rice, had multiple problems. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Hey, BelfastBrooks! I'm pretty concerned about some of your changes at this article. You removed stuff from the lead, added stuff sourced to what appear to be blogs and company websites, changed a quote, and removed sourced content. I've spent the last half hour correcting your work. —valereee (talk) 14:52, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Ineedtostopforgetting per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ineedtostopforgetting. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 13:49, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BelfastBrooks (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Seriously, why am I blocked? What is this evidence here? This is frankly ridiculous. Please use some common sense that INSTF is almost definitely not this influential, and that other users are getting harmed in the process. I've laid out my reasons on that SPI where I was frivolously reported.

Decline reason:

I don't find this request convincing and see no need to dispute the conclusions of the SPI. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:07, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.