User talk:Belanov87
Welcome!
Hello, Belanov87, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!--MollyPollyRolly (talk) 19:45, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
Bot-created articles
[edit]Hello Belanov87! Are you creating all these stubs using a bot? Note that running a bot without approval is not allowed (see WP:BOTS). Mass creating these automated microstubs gets somewhat disruptive. Best, MarioGom (talk) 23:07, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
- @MarioGom: Hi MarioGom, I creating localities stubs by my hands, it is not automated and I don't use any bots. Do I need any approval for doing this by my hands, is it disruptive? Belanov87 (talk) 11:50, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Ok. I'm sorry if I misinterpreted this. The stubs structure and pace appeared as auto-generated by some semi-automated tool. This kind of thing would need bot approval. But it might not be your case. You might want to seek advice on WikiProjects, like Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Spain, about the structure of these stubs. Best, MarioGom (talk) 08:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
- It is worth noting that even hand-created articles are covered by bot-policy if they are created in a bot-like fashion (see WP:MEATBOT). FOARP (talk) 15:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amorós, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amorós until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
Autopatrolled granted
[edit]Hi Belanov87, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the autopatrolled right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. However, you should consider adding relevant wikiproject talk-page templates, stub-tags and categories to new articles that you create if you aren't already in the habit of doing so, since your articles will no longer be systematically checked by other editors (User:Evad37/rater and User:SD0001/StubSorter.js are useful scripts which can help). Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Schwede66 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
- There's a discussion about this and as you've been pinged, you will have seen it. Based on what was discussed, I shall remove autopatrolled for now. Feel free to join that discussion; happy to hear your view on the matter. Schwede66 03:28, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Spanish location stubs
[edit]Hi Belanov87. I see from WP:NPP that you've recently been creating a large number of articles related to Spanish locations based solely on the INE database and 2ua.org/, which appears to be a Google maps-like database. Taking Otano (Navarra) as an example, the INE database calls this a "population unit" (Unidad Poblacional), which appears to be a census-taking unit (which are outside of WP:GEOLAND#1), and anyway provides no significant coverage of the subject. As 2ua.org is only a map it cannot substantiate notability of the topic per WP:NGEO. I am therefore not sure that this location is notable under our guidelines. Is it possible to show how it does meet our guidelines for notability? FOARP (talk) 16:01, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Colldarnat for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Colldarnat until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
FOARP (talk) 16:46, 3 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Sallent, Coll de Nargó for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sallent, Coll de Nargó until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–dlthewave ☎ 17:51, 12 December 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Otano (Navarra) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Otano (Navarra) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
–dlthewave ☎ 04:04, 15 December 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)