User talk:Bekah01
This user is a student editor in University_at_Albany/Information_Literacy_in_the_Humanities_and_Arts_(Fall_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, Bekah01! Thank you for your contributions. I am Oshwah and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- The Teahouse, our help forum for new users
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:40, 21 August 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Bekah01, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi Bekah01! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse,
|
Peer Review
[edit]Hi Bekah, I think your article so far is very good. I believe you have covered the five elements that make a Wikipedia article good, as you have a clear beginning section, everything is organized well, and neutral sources. You added a lot of information to the article, and definitely gave a more detailed account of his life. If anything, I would say perhaps some more information in the Auschwitz section? Other than that, I would say it looks organized, informative, and neutral. In terms of sources, I think everything looks good, except I feel like I remember one of the modules saying to stay away from sources like "The New York Times." I could be totally wrong, and please ignore this comment if I am. Thank you for sharing your work! Rpowers2 (talk) 14:42, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
WCI peer review
[edit]Hi Bekah, I think the organization of your article is very good. You started off with a clear and strong introduction. The way you organized the article by titling the different secionts by the different names of the concentration camps was very clear and easy to understand. I Think you could add a little more information about Alfred Kantor's life before being sent to concentration camps. That section of the article was very short and could definitely include more details. I think including information about his life before the camps would semphisize how much his life changed when he was sent to concentration camps. I thought you covered thre five elements of a good Wikipedia page well. You seemed to have reliable sources. I think you could also include more information about the different concentration camps. The article just seemed a little short for me. Overall the article was very organized, informative and neutral. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Giannapicariello (talk • contribs) 17:25, 1 October 2020 (UTC)