User talk:Behcet123

A tag has been placed on Cleeve Park School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Greswik 18:54, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

July 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created, BEHCET AND LIAM IN THE ROOM, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Dina 19:08, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on BEHCET AND LIAM IN THE ROOM, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

Notability of BEHCET AND LIAM IN THE ROOM

A tag has been placed on BEHCET AND LIAM IN THE ROOM, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. superβεεcat 21:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NeilN 21:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to BEHCET AND LIAM IN THE ROOM. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornix 21:24, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Philippe | Talk 21:30, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 31 hours, for adding errors to the encyclopedia. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 22:01, 25 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

August 2010

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Andreasm just talk to me 03:56, 2 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Tokio Hotel, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 00:45, 15 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]