User talk:Behal509
Welcome
[edit]
|
Gerhard Medicus (born 1950 in Salzburg) is a behavioral biologist and evolutionary psychiatrist from Austria. In 1982 he obtained his MD degree from the School of Medicine, Innsbruck University (Innsbruck Medical University). The following year he became research assistant of Rupert Riedl at the Zoological Institute, University of Vienna. Between 1985 and 1988 Medicus pursued a residency in general medical practice at the district hospital in Innsbruck. He additionally served a residency in psychiatry and neurology at the Psychiatric Hospital of Tyrol in Hall (1989 – 1993). After completion, Medicus became psychiatrist at this hospital, where he worked from 1994 until 2015. Since 1988 he has also been associated with the Research Unit for Human-Ethology of the Max-Planck-Institute for Behavioral Physiology in Andechs and Seewiesen, Munich. As a free-lance coworker he has cooperated with different research projects in the Trobriand Islands, Papua New Guinea, in the Maluku Islands, Indonesia, in Himbaland, Namibia as well as in Vanuatu and Burkina Faso. Since 1990 Medicus has additionally lectured in “human ethology” at the Institute of Psychology, University of Innsbruck. Gerhard Medicus made notable scientific contributions to the behavioural evolution of vertebrates (i.e. phylogenetic roots of cognition, possessive behaviour, gender differences, humanity, consciousness etc.), the field of psychomotorical development and the biogenetic rule (recapitulation theory), scientific bases of psychotherapy as well as the epistemology of interdisciplinarity between human sciences and humanities (e.g. Periodic Table of Human Sciences, which elucidates the realm of Tinbergen’s Four Questions). His main scientific contributions are summarized in his book “Being Human” (2015).
English Publications: 1987: “Toward an Etho-Psychology: A Phylogenetic Tree of Behavioral Capabilities Proposed as a Common Basis for Communication between Current Theories in Psychology and Psychiatry.” In: J.R. Feierman (ed.), The Ethology of Psychiatric Populations; Ethology and Sociobiology, Vol. 8, No. 3S (Supplement): 131-150. New York: Elsevier.
Medicus G. & S. Hopf, 199O: “The Phylogeny of Male/Female Differences in Sexual Behavior.” In: J.R. Feierman (ed.), Pedophilia, Biosocial Dimensions; pp 122-149. New York: Springer.
1992: “The Inapplicability of the Biogenetic Rule to Behavioral Development.” Human Development, 35, Heft 1: pp 1-8.
1995: “Ethological Aspects of Aggression.” Evolution and Cognition, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 54-63.
2005: “Mapping Transdisciplinarity in Human Sciences.” In: J.W. Lee (ed.), Focus on Gender Identity, pp 95-114. New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.
2010: “‘Zoon politikon:’ Biopsychological Aspects.” In: Brüne M., Salter F., und McGrew W.C. (eds.), Building Bridges between Anthropology, Medicine and Human Ethology – Tributes to W. Schiefenhövel. Bochum: European University Press
2015: Being Human - Bridging the Gap between the Sciences of Body and Mind. Berlin: Verlag für Wissenschaft und Bildung.
References:
http://www.vwb-verlag.com/Katalog/m584.html
http://homepage.uibk.ac.at/~c720126/humanethologie/ws/medicus/block5/Medicus_engl_Cover.pdf
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerhard Medicus (May 5)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerhard Medicus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Teahouse,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! wia (talk) 23:22, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Gerhard Medicus (June 9)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gerhard Medicus and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
Hello! Behal509,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! RichT|C|E-Mail 15:39, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Draft:Gerhard Medicus concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gerhard Medicus, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Gerhard Medicus
[edit]
Hello, Behal509. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Gerhard Medicus".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. The StormCatcher (talk) (contribs) 19:18, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 1)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Behal509/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
Hello! Behal509,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 00:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: User:Behal509/sandbox has a new comment
[edit]
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 1)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Behal509/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
AfC notification: User:Behal509/sandbox has a new comment
[edit]I have a few comments. First, you haven't successfully tagged the existing draft for deletion. I can see that you tried to tag it for deletion. Second, you haven't removed the reference to German Wikipedia. A Wikipedia in another language is not a reference. It is a See Also or a link. Third, the German Wikipedia and the English Wikipedia may have different standards. The fact that his draft has been accepted in the German Wikipedia does not accept it in the English Wikipedia. Fourth, do you want me to ask for comments at the Teahouse? Robert McClenon (talk) 19:14, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- That would be great (Teahouse) Tried to get latest to sandbox...I am editor challenged. Tagged for deletion...seemed to accept, so yes Teahouse might be best. Thanks,Behal509 (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, User:Behal509/sandbox
[edit]Hello, Behal509. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 13:50, 22 May 2017 (UTC)