User talk:Beg4myskillz

I heard you will have a wonderful weekend in the near future.--JBelkin24 (talk) 19:51, 24 January 2013 (UTC)JBelkin24[reply]

March 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Aspartame, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Yobol (talk) 23:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Aspartame. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Yobol (talk) 23:59, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Hunger Games (film) with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Theo10011 (talk) 00:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

psychology articles

Hi Michael, When listing links within wikipedia, you don't need to include the whole URLs. Just put the article title in double brackets. Use edit to see how I listed the ones below.

Type A and Type B personality theory <-- could be a good one to edit, but beware, this article gets a lot of attention (and so will your edits)

fear appeals <-- this one looks like it's already pretty good quality, but if you can find a specific area within it that needs work, go for it

personal distress <-- could be a good one. Could easily be expanded.

self-esteem functions <-- another good one.

weapons effect <-- another good one. Shouldn't be difficult to research.

ScottPKingPhD (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review Shenandoah University

Your article was very well put together. I remember you mentioning another wiki pro helping you out. Well your article looks pretty professionally done. I liked how you have the good the bad and the ugly from what you found on the weapons effect. I feel this is a pretty big topic in psychology especially with criminal crimes. Your sources seem legit. The only flaws I found were some basic grammatical errors. You can tell you really did your research on this topic. Before your editing the article was pretty basic with your edits it made the article actually pretty interesting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wjackson10 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feed back! I am trying to make the article look as professional as possible. Hopefully i will be able to get some help along the way. Beg4myskillz (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Beg4myskillzBeg4myskillz (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

Hey man good stuff with this artical. I like how much you added and how you organized it. Just a couple of points:

Just a few grammer errors
Your sources look good
Love that you talked about the Bobo experiment
Some of the parts go into super detail which might not be necessary but I understand why you would add so much. Tryin to get ur word count up for the last assignment i see ;) haha jk

Other then those it looks good. GLKeepr1 (talk) 00:58, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think the Bobo experiment is huge in this study on weapons effect. I am trying to be as detailed as possible when listing statistics so i am accurate. Beg4myskillz (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)Beg4myskillzBeg4myskillz (talk) 15:49, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help us improve the Wikipedia Education Program

Hi Beg4myskillz! As a student editor on Wikipedia, you have a lot of valuable experience about what it's like to edit as a part of a classroom assignment. In order to help other students like you enjoy editing while contributing positively to Wikipedia, it's extremely helpful to hear from real student editors about their challenges, successes, and support needs. Please take a few minutes to answer these questions by clicking below. (Note that the responses are posted to a public wiki page.) Thanks!

Delivered on behalf of User:Sage Ross (WMF), 17:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]