User talk:Beccaynr/Archives/2021/June
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Beccaynr. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
A kitten for you!
To the righteous one. Long may you reign (Sorry I am a game of thrones fan).
Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:26, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Meow and thank you, Nomadicghumakkad, and I have more to say about why I removed the tag than appears in my edit summary, and I plan to discuss it further if a discussion opens on the article Talk page (e.g. our major contributions to cleaning up the article since it was created, and the lack of apparent connection between the AfD commenter and article creator). But in the meantime, cheers! Beccaynr (talk) 19:02, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Meow Meow Beccaynr. I am just starting a note on that and I want to again say that I haste in doing things and then learn from you about what was the appropriate thing to do. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:16, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Hey Beccaynr. What do you think is really happening with this new theatrics? Also, the new user who had commeneted (the keep you restored) knows awfully much what secondary sources for the amount of editing (4 edits) they have done. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 19:41, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
- Nomadicghumakkad, I'm not sure if there currently is enough to pass the duck test, and without a block, I don't think a vote can be struck (see WP:SOCKSTRIKE), so I added SPA templates instead of striking the !vote, because that seems like the more clear method to refactor the discussion for when the closing admin reviews it, instead of having an explanation in the edit summary. Beccaynr (talk) 19:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Justin Brummer
Hello, Beccaynr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Justin Brummer, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
I thought this subject might interest you. I apologize that it could use a little work. FloridaArmy (talk) 14:13, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: thank you very much for bringing this draft to my attention - I have added some preliminary research and can plan on expanding the article over the next several days. There is more biographical information in several articles, as well as a variety of legal processes that can be further developed. Thanks again, Beccaynr (talk) 15:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
- @FloridaArmy: I have finished a rework of the article, and while I think there is more that can be done, including to expand biographical content (I think it would be helpful to keep a lookout for additional articles about her that continue to get published), the legal chronology is more developed. I plan to review the article again after some rest, but please let me know if you have any questions in the meantime. Thank you, Beccaynr (talk) 04:06, 6 June 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 15 Percent Pledge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
July 2021 at Women in Red
Women in Red | July 2021, Volume 7, Issue 7, Numbers 184, 188, 202, 203, 204, 205
|
--Rosiestep (talk) 16:04, 22 June 2021 (UTC) via MassMessaging