User talk:BeccaTrans
Welcome
[edit]
|
February 2020
[edit] Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nittatsu Hosoi, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dai Gohonzon have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Materialscientist (talk) 18:25, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 4
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sisters of Charity of Jesus and Mary, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mother Superior (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 4 March 2020 (UTC)
You can preview changes
[edit] Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. In the future, please use the preview button before you save your edit; this helps you find any errors you have made and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history, as well as helping prevent edit conflicts. Below the edit box is a Show preview button. Pressing this will show you what the article will look like without actually saving it.
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/47/Mediawiki-button-preview.png/760px-Mediawiki-button-preview.png)
It is strongly recommended that you use this before saving. If you have any questions, contact the help desk for assistance. Thank you. - Bri.public (talk) 19:27, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
Tsunesaburō Makiguchi
[edit] Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tsunesaburo Makiguchi, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please discuss on the article's talk page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tacktician (talk • contribs) 18:32, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Tacktician, this user is now blocked as a sock puppet; they have a tendency to insert lies in articles, so be careful. Drmies (talk) 22:26, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit] This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Amparo Muñoz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. "Emotional tantrums"? "infamous event"? NONE of that is in the source. Drmies (talk) 22:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
- Ponyo, Oshwah, I would like to ask you to have another look at this one with your CU glasses, to see if there's anything that needs tightening up, and if any SPIs need additional paperwork. What this person is doing is disgusting. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 22:10, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- @Drmies: Oshwah doesn't appear to be around much. Can you send me a very brief email to let me know what I should be looking at?-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 22:16, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
- Ponyo - I'm very much still active on this project; I've just been busy lately, which is why my activity goes up and down over the course of a few weeks at a time. ;-) ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:36, 13 May 2020 (UTC)