User talk:Beanpickle

This is Beanpickle's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2004 EW95 (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Perryprog was:

This is not the correct place to request new redirects. Please follow the instructions at Articles for creation/Wizard-Redirects. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2004 EW95 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2004 EW95, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Perryprog (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Beanpickle! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Perryprog (talk) 13:55, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

October 2021

Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia invites everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with Azamara Pursuit, have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. . Zsohl ^(Talk) 06:00, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Beanpickle. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 09:04, 4 October 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkl talk

Welcome!

Hello, Beanpickle, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Simplified Manual of Style
Your first article
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Helen(💬📖) 23:40, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop now!

Hello, Beanpickle,

You are a very new editor. You are not using Speedy deletion criteria appropriately and this causes other editors to have to clean up after your mistaggings. Please do not take on tasks for more experienced editors or you might find yourself blocked very soon. You are moving too fast. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:58, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are also overwhelming Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories with hundreds of requests and, as far as I know, there is one primary editor who responds to requests. It is too much for any editor to respond to and you are forbidden from making any more requests on that noticeboard for ONE WEEK. No more requests for one week! I mean it. I will block you if you add one more. Find other tasks to do, hopefully, in moderation.

If you have questions about Wikipedia, please bring them to the Teahouse. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I'm new so I don't know much about speedy deletion, I just tried to delete those pages since I requested their creation in the first place. Beanpickle (talk) 03:07, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Liz: this user is overwhelming AFCRC again. As they have had an account long enough to create their own redirects, I think you may need to page-block them. User:力 (power~enwiki, π, ν) 18:52, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ok I will stop again Beanpickle (talk) 19:16, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Beanpickle. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Redirects and categories.
Message added 18:26, 12 October 2021 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Qwerfjkl talk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zethus (crater) has been accepted

Zethus (crater), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Artem.G (talk) 14:36, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Moon (moon of Earth)

A tag has been placed on Moon (moon of Earth) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a recently created redirect from an implausible typo or misnomer, or other unlikely search term.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – NJD-DE (talk) 00:12, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is the rush?

Hello, Beanpickle,

You are creating HUNDREDS of redirects a day! Editing on Wikipedia should not be done in a hurry, if you understand some policy incorrectly, there might be hundreds, maybe thousands of edits that other editors would have to revert. Please read Wikipedia:There is no deadline and slow down. Make each new page thoughtfully and carefully, Wikipedia will be around for a long time and there is no rush.

Right now, your behavior raises a lot of red flags that attract administrator attention which most editors would prefer to avoid. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:53, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not rushing for any particular reason. Beanpickle (talk) 00:55, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As someone who's reviewed hundreds of these redirects today, please slow down. While none of them that I have seen so far are harmful, we're experiencing a bit of a backlog within WP:NPP at the moment and it's making the job of finding inappropriate redirects harder. Is there a script that you're using to identify and/or create these redirects? If so, there might be a way to allow for the mass creation of these redirects without overwhelming the New Pages Patrol. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 04:00, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have any script for it, but I will slow down. Beanpickle (talk) 04:05, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem! Going through, the vast majority appear to have been OK. I've nominated only a handful for speedy deletion. — Mikehawk10 (talk) 05:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Some are clearly NOT GOOD though, like E I Moon, Earth (astronomy) and Earth I Moon. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The main I made E I Moon and Earth I Moon was because it was more descriptive than just Moon, because that could mean any natural satellite, however Moon redirects to Earth's Moon anyways, so those redirects may not be that important. Beanpickle (talk) 14:09, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is a pseudoperm for autopatrolled redirects (see Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Redirect whitelist). ― Qwerfjkl talk 18:49, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Categorising redirects

Hi, when creating redirects, please categorise them. Tools like User:Wugapodes/Capricorn can help with this. I can also mass-categorise pages if you provide a list. ― Qwerfjkl talk 18:46, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Changing rcats

Thank you for changing the rcats (e.g. here).
I think I have fixed the rest:^[1]
(14827) Hypnos

^ See User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox5 and Special:History/User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox for how I obtained these pages.

― Qwerfjkl talk 22:52, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pharos (crater) has been accepted

Pharos (crater), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 06:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:52, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Barnard’s Star in fiction" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Barnard’s Star in fiction has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 May 3 § Barnard’s Star in fiction until a consensus is reached. TompaDompa (talk) 22:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] See User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox5 and Special:History/User:Qwerfjkl/sandbox for how I obtained these pages.

[1]