User talk:Beanom

Beanom, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Beanom! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 25 January 2021 (UTC)

Mass removals of content

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. --MONGO (talk) 19:49, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 19:52, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

And this time you will not be unblocked so easily.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Save me Jebus!!!!!!!

@Ymblanter:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beanom (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The quality of mercy is not strained. It droppeth as the gentle rain from heaven upon the streets below. It is twice blessed, once by the guy who gives it and once by the guy who gets it. It is a quality of Gods and someone else. Beanom (talk) 20:00, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Here endeth the lesson. Talk page access revoked. Favonian (talk) 20:04, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I suggest that the admin who rejects this request also revokes tpa.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The quality of mercy

Just a note, for clarity's sake: user is already righteously blocked as a troll. They were suspected to be a sock, and I can confirm that the technical evidence is enough for a CU block as well, since they match User:Caretaker John--but this block log is already long enough. In addition, we can throw doxxing into the mix, of course, which is particularly tasteless. All of this is noted at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Gordimalo. Drmies (talk) 22:15, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]