User talk:Beanbuff

2

Fair use rationale for Image:CoffeeKidsLogo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:CoffeeKidsLogo.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:30, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Coffee Kids

What I did with the article was called a move (you can do the same thing through the "move" tab at the top of any Wikipedia page). It's how you can "rename" a page. Essentially, you move the page and everything associated with it—including, most importantly, the history—from one name to another. As you've probably noticed by now, page names here are case sensitive beyond the first letter: "Coffee Kids" isn't the same as "Coffee kids". Generally, moving an article requires that the name you want to move it to not already exist (it's what keeps me from renaming the Canada article to United States, for example). Does that all make sense? The page I linked to above has more specifics if you want them.

As to the article itself, the only thing I can really see that needs to be added is an assertion of notability. For something to be included in Wikipedia, it needs to be notable, which is usually ascertained through independent coverage by reliable sources. The sources you've currently linked to on the page are mostly just stuff from the organization's website. Since it's based in Santa Fe, have there been any articles on it from local, mainstream news sources (such as the New Mexican)? Hope that helps! Esrever ^(klaT) 13:58, 20 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Beanbuff

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:Beanbuff, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person, and which is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages: user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for businesses.

If you can indicate why the page is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page in question and leave a note on this page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Calton | Talk 00:29, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:CoffeeKidsLogo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:CoffeeKidsLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:13, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coffee Kids

The article Coffee Kids has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NORG due to little independent coverage.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DrStrauss talk 12:29, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]