User talk:Be in Nepean

Welcome!

Hello, Be in Nepean, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Infrogmation (talk) 04:37, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:DRV

Go here :) SGGH ^ping! 20:45, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Sarah Thomson (politician), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HalfShadow 20:47, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've raised a couple of concerns on the article talk page, perhaps add it to your watch list? SGGH ^ping! 20:55, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia can be rough

Hi, I noticed you've been receiving a bit of rough treatment (I'm looking at the thread right above). Just letting you know that it's not all bad and people are supposed to be nice (check out WP:BITE), but unfortunately the nice people don't always have the dominating personalities or time to get involved in the politics. Watch your step and if you get blocked randomly, good luck - you won't necessarily be helped. I'm not going to get involved in your little dispute, but if you have any questions feel free to ask. Keep in mind that everyone's a volunteer and patience can run a bit thin when people think their time is being wasted. II | (t - c) 22:46, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Women's Post. –xeno^talk 14:28, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion on closure of Israel and Aparthied mediation

Current consensus seems to be to move the article to Israel and Apartheid with an appropriate disambiguation line to prevent any misinterpretations. Please weigh in over the next few days. --Ludwigs2 17:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]