User talk:Bdaroff

Please stop spamming=

see WP:SPAM. Johnbod (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please stop spamming. The links you keep adding are not in accordance with WP:EL. The conflict of interest is also plain to see. Drmies (talk) 19:06, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 19:10, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A general response concerning your requests to include links to your site

That it's your site does raise concerns about a potential conflict of interest. However, there is WP:ELNO #11, which disqualifies "Links to blogs, personal web pages and most fansites, except those written by a recognized authority. (This exception for blogs, etc., controlled by recognized authorities is meant to be very limited; as a minimum standard, recognized authorities always meet Wikipedia's notability criteria for people.)" Unfortunately, you do not appear to be a recognized authority. Ian.thomson (talk) 15:24, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ian.thomson, Many thanks for addressing my requests to re-include external links to some of my projects. I would argue that my pages are not blogs or personal web pages. While you are correct, I am not a recognized authority, I noticed point #3 under WP:ELYES which allows for links to "Sites that contain neutral and accurate material that is relevant to an encyclopedic understanding of the subject and cannot be integrated into the Wikipedia." I believe my content is neutral, accurate and cannot be integrated into Wikipedia because my pages are image-based rather than text-based and involve flash/java mouse-over interactions. My project 'Stories in Art' (http://beckydaroff.com/stories/) contributes to an encyclopedic understanding of common themes in art such as Leda and the Swan or Danae and the Shower of Gold because it allows the user to visually compare how different artists handle these themes.