User talk:Bcjohnston

Welcome!

Hi Bcjohnston! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't abuse the Minor edit flag/checkbox

Please don't mark edits Minor unless they meet the criteria for such edits (see WP:MINOR). From that article:

A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions. Examples include typographical corrections, corrections of minor formatting errors, and reversion of obvious vandalism. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. An edit of this kind is marked in its page's revision history with a lower case, bolded "m" character (m).
By contrast, a major edit is one that should be reviewed for its acceptability to all concerned editors. Any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if it concerns a single word; for example, the addition or removal of "not" is not a minor edit.

You flagged your recent edits of the Claude_Shannon article as minor; they were good additions, but they weren't minor edits.

Thanks! — UncleBubba ^{( T @ C )} 19:44, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments! The edits I made to Claude Shannon seemed to me to meet the criteria for "Minor". In the first, I added his MIT degrees to the floating box, both of which are mentioned (and cited) in the article. My second edit added items from the floating box to the "Also see" section; the only changes made were formatting and alphabetical sorting. My third edit removed the duplication that I had inadvertently introduced in the second edit. You are correct about the edit I made to A Symbolic Analysis of Relay and Switching Circuits – that one was not minor, I did add an URL. Thanks for pointing this out.

My interest was stimulated by reading an online article, How Claude Shannon Invented the Future. Do you think I should cite this article on Claude Shannon page? Bcjohnston (talk) 20:09, 28 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samuel Wakefield (pastor) (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Seawolf35 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bcjohnston/Samuel Wakefield (pastor) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Seawolf35 ^T--C 07:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bcjohnston! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Seawolf35 ^T--C 07:32, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Bcjohnston/Samuel Wakefield (pastor)

Hello, Bcjohnston. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Bcjohnston/Samuel Wakefield (pastor), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:10, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]