User talk:Batsnumbereleven

Hello Batsnumbereleven! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and another Wikipedian will show up shortly. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! -- The Hyb rid 18:02, 6 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Advice

I would like to thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thanks again. John Reaves 14:52, 9 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Glen Jacobs

We're cool. Cheers, -- Mikedk9109 (hit me up) ^SIGN 21:57, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Cricket

Hello, Batsnumbereleven. Thanks for updating all the England cricketers' infoboxes today.

I'm writing to ask if you've discovered WikiProject Cricket yet. If you're interested in editing cricket articles, feel free to come and join us. We have a talk page where we discuss the cricket articles, and also a little quiz.

Stephen Turner (Talk) 16:24, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: PPV location terminology

I agree with you. "From" doesn't sound right.-- bulletproof ^3:16 19:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...sigh...-- bulletproof ^3:16 04:51, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Beat me to it

Bah...beat me to it on the reverting of vandalism of the RAW page. How dare someone actually revert right before me! :P Keep up the good work! Anakinjmt 19:19, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GoF

I felt that it didn't read very well after the information removal - by reducing it to a short summation of a few key moments, it became a list, which seemed almost arbitrary in the information kept or removed. Michaelsanders 14:20, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your fine contributions that don't go unnoticed. Keep 'em coming -- bulletproof ^3:16 22:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

World Cup "draw"

It went as follows:

Australia (1): group A Sri Lanka (2): group B New Zealand (3): group C Pakistan (4): group D.

Now, from the next level (5-8) there were three teams that had to be kept apart from Australia, so South Africa (5) had to go there. Otherwise it would have snaked back and South Africa would have been in group D. Instead, West Indies (6) in group D, England (7) in C and India (8) in B.

You'll also notice the ECB press release which is cited [1]; "If the draw were made using the rankings as they stand at the moment, the groups would be as follows:". This suggests there was no drawing of lots involved whatsoever. Sam Vimes | Address me 09:13, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thought you'd see it my way. ;)

By the way, top work on Australian cricket team in England in 1993. Must have been a chaotic time! Sam Vimes | Address me 12:53, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alain Prost

I've suggested what looks like the middle ground at the Alain Prost talk page (regarding team mate comparisons). I'd be grateful if you could comment on whether you're willing to accept it. Cheers. 4u1e 14:22, 25 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

English cricket team in Australia in 1994–95

Hello there. I saw your addittions to the above, and would like to drop a quick, friendly and polite word about your writing. Your contributions, while well written, sometimes read more like a match summary by the BBC or CricInfo, whereas Wikipedia is to report the bare facts. I have removed some of the less suitablly toned sentences, and by my edits you may see what I mean. As a lot of it is uncited, thus the risk is run that your contributions read as your own opinions and conclusions regarding the match, when Wikipedia can only report the conclusions and opinions of third party, reliable sources.

You might find my attitudes too conservative, or think I was too drastic in my reductions, I am happy to agree to disagree, however I do feel this article could do with some tone, style and content changes, many of which I have effected and the rest I have tagged for.

Happy editing, and kind regards. SGGH ^speak! 11:19, 18 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Worcestershire County Cricket League

Hi Batsnumbereleven! An article you have been involved with has been tagged by a parent project as needing possible attention to some details. If you can help with these issues please see Talk:Worcestershire County Cricket League, and leave any comments there.--Kudpung (talk) 07:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]