User talk:Bashtowndriyp

Hello, Bashtowndriyp, and welcome to Wikipedia!
Thank you for registering an account.
I hope you like the place and decide to stay.


	Introduction 5 The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Help Tips	How to write a great article Manual of Style Be Bold Assume Good faith Get adopted

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, or get instant online help at IRC.
You can also place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will come shortly to answer your questions.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:44, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Driyp Drop

Hello Bashtowndriyp, my name is Howicus. I saw that you marked Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Driyp Drop as under review. I've reverted that, since most of your edits are to that page or a related page, and I don't think you should review an AFC submission that you're that involved with. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:30, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Im not associated with Driyp Drop in any way.. Ive also been reviewing Articles for 3 years to today under a different user

If you're not associated with Driyp Drop (signed by Bashtown records), then why the name similarity? Also, what is your other username? Howicus (Did I mess up?) 20:52, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop trying to review the Driyp Drop page, the sources are not nearly good enough for the page to be accepted at this time. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:07, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please stop trying to review Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Driyp Drop. You are clearly connected to Driyp Drop, as shown by what used to be in your sandbox and edits like this, where you call the page "our article". Howicus (Did I mess up?) 21:25, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On a more general note, I don't think that, with a single mainspace edit, you have the experience necessary to review article drafts. Also, you seem to have marked drafts as "being reviewed" without ever reviewing them. That's not helpful since it'll remove the drafts from the queue and put them in limbo. Huon (talk) 23:24, 17 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternate account

It seems that you are operating the following account(s):

Bashtowndriyp (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)
Marcusbayiv (talk⁺ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

I say this because at this now blanked version of your userpage, you state that you own Marcus Bay Productions.

Please respond to this. Also, I would like some forthright explanations to the concerns I raised here. You simply blanked the page to make the problems go away.

Anna Frodesiak (talk) 02:12, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

not at all

I have blocked this account for one week for engaging in sockpuppetry as Anna has pointed out above. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:54, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Frodesiak Go get a damn life and get off mine. you have nothing else to do? Anna Frodesiak How am I connected with marcusbayiv??? please tell me. you have NO PROOF! You need quit with your investigating because ive doing nothing wrong please get a life

Bashtowndriyp, I highly doubt you've edited Wikipedia for three years considering you don't know how to indent and sign comments. Newyorkadam (talk) 00:17, 19 December 2013 (UTC)Newyorkadam[reply]

No proof? How about a strong suspicion. Your userpage said you own Marcus Bay Productions and the other account is Marcusbayiv (Registered 9/16/2013), suddenly making its first edit a day after you blanked that declaration.

Also, a strong suspicion is enough to probe your actions and ask questions. To those questions, you have been evasive, aloof, have blanked your userpage to remove evidence, and have even just blanked the entire discussion.

You are editing problematically, and it is my responsibility to address that. In response to your "...You need quit with your investigating because ive doing nothing wrong...", allow me to list the problematic edits:

Promoted your company
Promoted yourself
Copy pasted from another article without attribution, a copyright violation
Declined other musical artist's AfC submissions, a clear conflict of interest
Lied saying you have no company
Lied saying you didn't create the article
Attempted to approve your own article [1]
Blanked the pages when asked about these issues

Your username and this now blanked version of your userpage show that you have a conflict of interest when it comes to any AfC work related to music industry-related articles. When you are unblocked, you must not handle those submissions. Other than that, read WP:COI and then do what you like without repeating items on that list above, or adding any new ones.

I'm not trying to be mean. I'm just trying to protect Wikipedia. Work with Wikipedia, not against it, okay? Thank you for your understanding. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:46, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]