User talk:Basanders

Welcome!

Hello, Basanders, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User/basanders, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:09, 30 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of tea for you!

Welcome back. Piandcompany (talk) 02:46, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

October 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Amanda Todd. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:49, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Amanda Todd with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Tgeairn (talk) 02:50, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 02:52, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Article for Deletion discussion

Hello! As others have pointed out above, please do not remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Amanda Todd. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at that page instead. Thank you. --Tgeairn (talk) 02:56, 14 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Basanders (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand that I was blocked for disruptive editing of a comment page for Amanda Todd and will not do it again. From now on I will make constructive edits to wikipedia. I am really sorry.

Decline reason:

A Checkuser determined that you had operated multiple accounts, as well as continuing to disrupt after ignoring repeated warnings to stop. This sort if thing, after being blocked, doesn't help your case either. At this point, "sorry" doesn't cut it - we need clear indications that your behaviour is going to reform, details of what steps you will take to ensure this, and assurances that you'll make constructive edits to the encyclopedia in the future. Your present unblock request provides none of the above. Yunshui 雲‍水 08:19, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Basanders (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

What? No... This is my only account, unless you are referring to me editing something before logging in and that was an actual constructive edit. I was actually on skype with piandcompany at the time. So... yeah. Anyway, I would like like to be unblocked, please. Thank you. :D

Decline reason:

Checkuser apparently says otherewise, and someone with access to that tool would have to review the evidence. But even so, I agree with Yunshui about the linked diff. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:29, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Checkuser note: Just for reference, there was no second account, but both an IP and account (that appear per CU evidence to be the same) !voted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Suicide of Amanda Todd, making Votestacking per CU. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 15:00, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Basanders (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Listen, you could talk to piandcompany, I was just messing with him since he could just do a rollback. I've never had an issue before that night. I didn't even know that would be votestacking, I mean hell, I don't even know what that is. I barely know the correct format for editing on wikipedia. You could ask piandcompany himself and he'll say I'm a good person. So, yeah.

Decline reason:

I have read this talk page and reviewed your contributions, and I was unable to find any evidence that unblocking this account would be likely to lead to a better encyclopedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:41, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What relevance does being "on skype with piandcompany" have? Being on Skype doesn't prevent you from doing things on Wikipedia. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:04, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Basanders (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

O.o Well of course I don't have many contributions, but that's because I haven't needed to make any edits. I wasn't even aware that what I was doing was a bannable offense, I mean I was just fooling around. I'm slightly new to the whole wikipedia editing scene and now I can't even edit the sandbox to practice.

Decline reason:

You have not made a single constructive edit with this account. I see nothing in this, or any other unblock request you've made that suggests this pattern is likely to change. If you make another frivolous unblock request that does not address the reason for your block, I will revoke your ability to edit even this page. Yunshui 雲‍水 18:10, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.