User talk:Bart cummins

January 2009

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Thompson Rivers University, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Thank you. єmarsee ^(Discuss) 01:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. єmarsee ^(Discuss) 06:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. єmarsee ^(Discuss) 07:09, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. єmarsee • Speak up! 05:14, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that still isn't going to be enough to get the tags to be removed. There are several occasions where text that are bolded does not needed to be bolded. Such examples as asking the reader to go the TRU website to learn more about it is simply unacceptable unless it is in the External Links section. Please read WP:MOS. Thank you. ~~єmarsee • Speak up! 06:32, 25 February 2009 (UTC)~~ єmarsee • Speak up! 06:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]