User talk:Barri123

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Bull has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bull was changed by Barri123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888708 on 2013-04-23T17:11:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:11, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=~~~~.}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:27, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barri123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why this Administrator has blocked my account as I am not doing anything to vandalise Wikipedia and have not said anything bad against anyone,and the edits on the Bull page where correct if you check properly so I was not vandalizing

Decline reason:

You have not said anything bad about anyone? Yes you have, and blatantly so -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:16, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barri123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

If I have made any edits or such against a person, I highly apologize and this will not happen again, I wish to get this account un-blocked primarily because nothing wrong was done here ! Any edits whcih were ever marked as vandalism for me was on the Bull although I was certain that this was legitament as what I put in that Wiki was true, also I apologize again If i ever made an edit against any individual.Barri123 (talk) 12:28, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

See your edits. Until you can address all of your contributions, specifically the clearly abusive ones, you will not be unblocked. Any more nonsensical requests will lead to the removal of your ability to post these requests. Kuru (talk) 12:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Barri123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have gone over my edits and I apologize for the inconvenice that I caused on the talk page of the ex-Administrator Yintan, and to the page of the Low-Level Programming language, I, Barri123, promise not to cause any inconveniece on Wikipedia or any other wikipedia-realted article again.Barri123 (talk) 3:55 pm, 11 May 2013, last Saturday (2 days ago) (UTC+1).

Decline reason:

You "apologize for the inconvenience"? Wow, way to make a half-assed unblock request. Insults so severe that they require revision deletion are not an "inconvenience", they are abuse. Looking over your other edits, I can't see a single one that actively improved Wikipedia - even those that (may have been) made in good faith were misplaced and poorly formatted. As things stand, I see no benefit to Wikipedia in unblocking you. Yunshui 雲‍水 07:14, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please do not remove declined unblock requests while you are still blocked - I have restored the one you removed. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:43, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't see Yintan's name on the list of former administrators. Why do you refer to "ex-Administrator Yintan"? Peridon (talk) 14:28, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yintan has announced on his page his retirement from Wikipedia; but has not given up the admin tools, and could return should he so wish.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:15, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - But he's a rollbacker not an admin, according to his user rights list. Peridon (talk) 15:42, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Correct; my error. I did not look far enough.--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 20:30, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]