User talk:BarrettM82

Watership Down Series 3 Cast Lineup

Hi Barrett, I just wanted to clear up some misconceptions you have over Series 3 of Watership Down. Most of the celebrity cast had left by this point, due to the factthat the show wasen't doing too well in UK ratings etc. So costs had to be cut for series 3 and since the show wasen't as popular as they hoped, many of the celebrity actors left, only Richard Briers remained to play the role of Captain Broom for the third series.

Now onto Hazel, yes the voice sounds similar to Ian Shaw, but it is not him. He is not listed in the end credits to Series 3, I think it may be Nigel Pegram providing his voice for Sries 3, however unfortunately I can't prove that, what I can prove though is Ian Shaw is not part of the case by Series 3, obviously he must have left to do other projects. The same can be said for the majority of the actors from Series 1 and 2. Only a handfull of the original actors stayed, since they can be keapt at a regular payment rate (I'd imagine) and because they themselves perhaps chose to stay on. I also believe that Pegram played Woundwort in this series as well, replacing John Hurt, but again I'm afraid I can't prove it at this moment in time.

There is a YouTube video that shows the cast list for Series 3; the list of the cast are as follows; Richard Biriers (the only UK celebrity to remain), Maria Darling, Andrew Falvey, Penny Freeman, David Holt, Anthony Jackson, Stephen Mangan, Sue Elliot Nicholls (the only female cast member to stay for all 3 series), Paul Panting, Nigel Pegram, Rob Rackstraw and Lee Ross. If you search YouTube for 'Watership Down Series Three Credits' you'll find the video and the cast list should appear streight away, revealing what I said is true.

I do hope that you will find this video and see it for yourself before you go ahead and make anymore further changes to the show's page on Wikipedia. Thank you. (D31 (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Re: Happy Feet Two

There may have been some baby thrown out with the bathwater there. I saw a cascade of changes of the name of the film to the {{PAGENAME}} template; that looked disruptive on the surface, so I reverted. —C.Fred (talk) 01:28, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oh. Sorry about that. I'll type the name of the article out next time. I wasn't made at you either.--BarrettM82 Contact 01:36, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And as for this edit I made, I removed the synopsis you added because it had been copied verbatim from another website. Plot summaries may not be copied from other websites, even official ones, due to issues with copyright violations. —C.Fred (talk) 02:10, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Killing Birds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hot wire (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Night of the Living Dead 3D: Re-animation, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scott Thomson and Max Taylor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Arachnid (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chris Potter (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:31, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rio 2 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rio 2 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rio 2 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 14:01, 8 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Hey, don't let Rio 2 slow you down. Keep editing and learn from others. Thank you for creating Rio 2, it is to contributors like you who make Wikipedia possible. I assure you, when it become certain that Rio 2 is in post-production, you will have your light to recreate the article. As of now, read WP:N and the respective notability guidelines before creating an article. Cheers and happy editing! - -Michaelzeng7 (talk - contribs) 20:23, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Chipettes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Queensberry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:AlvinandtheChipmunks4teaserposter.jpg

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on File:AlvinandtheChipmunks4teaserposter.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from https://www.facebook.com/pages/Alvin-and-the-Chipmunks-4/236944009713598. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Nate • (chatter) 05:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:AlvinandtheChipmunks4teaserposter.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:AlvinandtheChipmunks4teaserposter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Beerest355 Talk 14:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Your addition to Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. | Uncle Milty | talk | 07:05, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alpha and Omega 3.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alpha and Omega 3.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:05, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The image isn't being used on any articles because the one I had uploaded it to was part of an Articles for Deletion Discussion, and the article ended up being redirected to the sequels section here. I don't think there is any place that the image can be put, now, that it belongs.--BarrettM82 Contact 12:19, 15 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alpha and Omega 3: The Great Wolf Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mike Jacobs (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alpha and Omega 3 DVD cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alpha and Omega 3 DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Alpha and Omega 4 DVD cover.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Alpha and Omega 4 DVD cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:23, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gloria-HappyFeetTwo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gloria-HappyFeetTwo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:18, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

standalone film

A stand alone film with a different production and directors and makers is called as a prequel. Luxpapa (talk) 06:55, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

The movie isn't even connected to the 1998 movie. The creators of the 2014 movie have even said that, so please stop re-adding something that isn't even true. They have different monsters, an entire different tone and plot, and the 1998 movie never mentions the MUTOs, so the 2014 movie is in no way a prequel to the 1998 movie.--LillyOmega (Contact) 11:44, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Alpha and Omega: The Legend of the Saw Tooth Cave

An article that you have been involved in editing—Alpha and Omega: The Legend of the Saw Tooth Cave —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 22:49, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Land Before Time: Journey of the Brave: Update

Hey dude, I just saw your edits and I want to say thanks for updating the article. I was wondering if it's ok with you, and I already know your not an admin too. Should we add the cast in article? TheCrazyGuy6 (talk) 20:23, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, BarrettM82. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Jurassic World teaser poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Jurassic World teaser poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BarrettM82. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Tarbosaurus: The Mightiest Ever

Hi, I'm Mduvekot. BarrettM82, thanks for creating Tarbosaurus: The Mightiest Ever!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The sources do not establish that there was any kind of critical reception (reviews) of the film at all. I also struggle to see the film as a documentary. it's a fictional narrative. Can you provide sources that say it's a documentary? Thanks,

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Mduvekot (talk) 22:53, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, when I created the article, "documentary" was simply the best term I could think of at the time to label the movie as. When I watched it, it initially felt like a documentary, but by the end it didn't. Unfortunately I hadn't been sure about what else to label it as.--LillyOmega (Contact) 23:00, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dino-King-2-movie-poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dino-King-2-movie-poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, BarrettM82. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please don't change sourced content just because you saw someone's logo flash on the screen. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding unsourced content. Just because you saw a logo appear on the screen doesn't mean that something is a production company. We have a source cited in the article, and the companies you added are not in the source. Your original research does not trump what the reliable source says. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Legend of the Guardians: The Owls of Ga'Hoole; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:20, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. MarnetteD|Talk 19:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Dino King UK poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Dino King UK poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Tarbosaurus: The Mightiest Ever

The article Tarbosaurus: The Mightiest Ever has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable film, no independent reviews found in a WP:BEFORE. Found only sites selling the DVD/Blu-ray, other wikis, and some videos. Fails WP:NFILM. Tagged for notability since February 2018.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Donaldd23 (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TarbosaurusTheMightiestEverDVDCase.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TarbosaurusTheMightiestEverDVDCase.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:01, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]