Jump to content

User talk:Barkrich/Zelder Paradox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Comment

[edit]

Hey, just passing by when I read your comment on user talk:Deb and decided to read your draft. It looks allright, but I have one minor issue. The draft currently says: "Zelder's work has been widely cited.[1][2][3][4][5]". This is a classic example of original research. You are drawing the conclusion the work is widely cited, because you can find a lot of articles that reference it. Those five links only cite Zelder, they don't support the claim "Zelder's work has been widely cited". Instead you could say it was cited by X, Y and Z or give a number for the total number of cites (with source). Note: I did not actually check the references, so I apologize if I am mistaken about this. Yoenit (talk) 00:04, 29 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. I have changed the article to show the number of citations.Barkrich (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 19:21, 31 January 2011 (UTC).[reply]

  1. ^ Langlais, Eric (2010) "On Unilateral Divorce and the "Selection of Marriages" Hypothesis," Recherches Economiques de Louvain, vol. 76, No. 3, 229-256.
  2. ^ Dnes, Antony (2007) "Marriage, Cohabitation, and Same-Sex Marriage," The Independent Review, vol. 12, No. 1, 85-99.
  3. ^ Smith, Ian (2007) "Explaining the Growth of Divorce in Great Britain," Scottish Journal of Political Economy, vol. 44, 519-544.
  4. ^ Bowles, Roger and Garoupa, Nuno (2003) "Household Dissolution, Child Care and Divorce Law," International Review of Law and Economics, vol. 22, 495-510.
  5. ^ Gordon, Robert (1998) "The Limits of Limits on Divorce," Yale Law Journal, vol. 107, 1435-1465.
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Barkrich/Zelder_Paradox&oldid=411763135"