User talk:Bantikumarpks

Hi Bantikumarpks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like RhinosF1 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

05:30, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Satlok ashram mundka moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Satlok ashram mundka, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 19:29, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. GirthSummit _(blether) 10:34, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - I wanted to explain more fully why I have warned you for this. First, since your username matches the name of the founder of the website that was the subject that was the subject of your article, I assume you are that person. The article (which I have now deleted) appeared to be blatantly promotional - it was written in the first person, and extolled the work your website was involved in. Wikipedia is not a place where you can promote your website, or yourself. Please review our WP:COI and WP:PAID guidelines - you must comply with these, or your account will be blocked from editing.

I also note some dubious editing on your own user page, which appears to be a direct copy/paste from DBigXray's user page. You are allowed to copy other users' styles for your user page, but you have awarded yourself various accolades that you yourself did not actually earn, including one which suggests another specific editor has given you a barnstar when they did not - that is not acceptable. I suggest that you remove those, they really stand out as being are blantantly false for such a new account, and they will not impress other editors. Thanks GirthSummit _(blether) 10:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Satlok ashram mundka concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Satlok ashram mundka, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:27, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Satlok ashram mundka

Hello, Bantikumarpks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Satlok ashram mundka".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~riley (talk) 08:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

Hello, I'm Jaclar0529. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Brahma Kumaris seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. jaclar0529 (talk) 08:07, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Focus News without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please nominate a page for deletion instead blanking pages that you did not author. Ost (talk) 15:44, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This news channel doest not exist. That why i remove this page. Banti 02:30, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

The website used as a reference exists and goes to a site called Focus News, so I do not understand your claim that this channel does not exist. Even if it does not exist, users should not blank pages to delete them; they should be addressed through the appropriate deletion process. —Ost (talk) 15:53, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

the reference website is a fake website. not a real website. this news channel has been closed. the original website of the news channel is www,focusnews.com. please check again. = This site can’t be reached = www.focusnews.com refused to connect. Bantikumarpks

June 2020

Hello, I'm Lightbluerain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Ibrahim ibn Adham have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 18:13, 4 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Do not give knowledge to us. We know what's Wikipedia policies

But you don't seem to follow them. Also, what does "we" signify? Wikipedia accounts are not shared. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 18:44, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Ibrahim ibn Adham, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

You also seemed disrespectful towards the other editors. Please assume good faith towards other editors as well. Thanks again. Lightbluerain❄ (Talk | contribs) 18:39, 5 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with your custom signature

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)

Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:

Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:02, 7 September 2020 (UTC)