User talk:Bangbang43

Recent edit to RajadhiRaja

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Onel5969 (talk) 13:54, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Twenty:20 (film)

Your recent editing history at Twenty:20 (film) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Hammersoft (talk) 15:33, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Bangbang43 reported by User:Wiki-senetor (Result: ). Thank you. Wiki-senator 16:07, 23 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki-senetor (talk • contribs)

October 2014

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Twenty:20_(film), you may be blocked from editing. Your recent edits indicate your high vandalism bahaviour and section blankings of reliably sourced contents. Wikipedia is no place for fan fighting. If you continue your action you will welcome further actions from administration. Wiki-senator 16:31, 23 October 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki-senetor (talk • contribs)

Edit warring at Twenty:20 (film)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Twenty:20 (film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at WP:AN3#User:Bangbang43 reported by User:Wiki-senetor (Result: Both blocked). EdJohnston (talk) 20:12, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

October 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Twenty:20 (film). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:14, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And STILL the edit war continues

Despite blocks to both of you (Wiki-senetor, Bangbang43) the edit war is still continuing as witnessed at the edit history of the article. You have been pointed to dispute resolution. You've been encouraged to discuss the issue on the article's talk page or on each other's talk pages. You were warned. Then you were blocked. Despite this, you continue the edit war while making no attempt to discuss. Edit warring DOES NOT WORK as you both should have ample proof of by now. If either of you makes one more reversion of the other, I will recommend a substantially longer block. I hope I have been clear. If I haven't then ASK QUESTIONS, do not continue the edit war. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:06, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Twenty+20+first+look.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Twenty+20+first+look.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit waring and vandalism

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Twenty:20 (film). Wiki-senator 20:20, 1 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki-senetor (talk • contribs)

October 2014

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Twenty:20 (film). Wiki-senator 20:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki-senetor (talk • contribs)

November 2014

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Mfield (Oi!) 06:25, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to re-iterate my warning from before, hoping it does not fall on deaf ears again. If you continue the edit war after this block you can expect an extended block. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:45, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WP:AN/I notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:20, 7 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]