User talk:Bandatoryy

March 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Yume no Crayon Oukoku, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Ojamajo Doremi. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:20, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ruff-Ruff, Tweet and Dave

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Ruff-Ruff, Tweet and Dave, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:22, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Ruff-Ruff, Tweet and Dave. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:25, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Ruff-Ruff, Tweet and Dave. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:27, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at SuperFuckers. Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:29, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spencer^T♦C 21:35, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of 6Flamingo (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 06:05, 7 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]