User talk:Bananaman321

Ways to improve Empire of Luxembourg

Hi, I'm Dudel250. Bananaman321, thanks for creating Empire of Luxembourg!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello! could you please lead in your references section a link since there is a very similar hotel line to this "empire" making me suspect its a hoax. Thanks!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Dudel250 (talk) 23:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dudel250

Hello, first off, thank you for your contributions to the Wikipedia community. Secondly, regarding your edit of the page Empire of Luxembourg, I have taken a look at the hotel chain you mentioned, and while it is odd that there happens to be a series of hotels bearing a similar name, I do not see any link between them and this page. Furthermore, this page does not seem to me a hoax, although you can check the sources yourself if you like. I would just hate to see a valuable source of history taken down because here is a hotel chain with a similar name, so I have taken th liberty of removing the tags which you added. Thank you for your time, and happy editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EditShark53 (talk • contribs) 16:08, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Empire of Luxembourg for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Empire of Luxembourg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Empire of Luxembourg until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GB fan 18:01, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]