Jump to content

User talk:Bamyers99/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 10

15:20, 16 April 2018 (UTC)

User:AlexNewArtBot/FinlandSearchResult and its rules for categories

Could some of these rules be extended to the category name space? For example, recently created Category:Kiuruvesi, Category:Urjala, and Category:Evijärvi were not listed on User:AlexNewArtBot/FinlandSearchResult, so I reckon it would help if the bot could also find categories that use regional keywords such as Kainuu, Karelia, Kymenlaakso, Ostrobothnia, Pirkanmaa, Satakunta, Savonia, Tavastia, Uusimaa, or Åland. 88.113.105.239 (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

The regional categories have been added. --Bamyers99 (talk) 17:43, 21 April 2018 (UTC)

18:16, 23 April 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 26 April 2018

Hello. Can I suggest adding the word "constituency" to the search terms for User:AlexNewArtBot/ElectionsSearchResult? Cheers, Number 57 15:20, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

@Number 57: It has been added to the rules. --Bamyers99 (talk) 15:25, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Great, thanks! Number 57 15:26, 26 April 2018 (UTC)

Alex Realmuto

Read the article.

16:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my blunder

Hi,Bamyers99, On the Bill Elliott page... My embarrassing blunder. The Elliott article, long since finished, was in my sandbox and I deleted it there just borrow some space temporarily, but did not realize that doing so also deleted it in the main space. So why did the sandbox article mirror the main article? I looked at the main article before I did it and it did not say "redirected from ...." The current status is that the main article does indeed say "redirected from sandbox". Can you remove that and release my sandbox ? Thanks --Eagledj (talk) 13:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

@Eagledj: Just click on the link that is after "Redirected from" to go to the sandbox page. You can then edit the sandbox page. There is no need to keep the redirect that is on the sandbox page. You can edit the sandbox page and replace the redirect with whatever you want. --Bamyers99 (talk) 13:50, 6 May 2018 (UTC)

16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi Chamatkari Telephone is not an Indian series. It was an Czech series Mach a Šebestová dubbed in Hindi that's the reason I removed Indian categories from that page. Thanks. Sid95Q (talk) 07:15, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

@Sid95Q: Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I have redirected the page and kept the Indian categories on the redirect so that the Hindi version will be categorized. --Bamyers99 (talk) 14:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

22:23, 14 May 2018 (UTC)

17:34, 21 May 2018 (UTC)

CWGC memorials and Wikidata

Hello. Do you remember the CWGC Wikidata edits we discussed in March, see here? I have another question I hope you may be able to help with. Is there a way to list people with CWGC ids in Wikidata and query which memorials they are commemorated on or which cemetery they are buried in? The two examples are Alfred Cheetham (Q487478) and Bobby Atherton (Q4934724). Both are commemorated on the Tower Hill Memorial (see Tower Hill Memorial (Q2911428)), but I am not sure how to find other people commemorated on that memorial, and whether Wikidata contains the necessary information. I suspect it doesn't, but thought I should ask in case you have an idea of how to do that easily. Also, am not sure whether place of burial (P119) or commemorates (P547) applies for memorials and linking people named on a memorial to the memorial they are named on. What do you think? Carcharoth (talk) 11:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

@Carcharoth: There is a new property proposal at wikidata:Wikidata:Property proposal/dedicated object that looks like what you are looking for to link a person to their memorial. --Bamyers99 (talk) 16:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Heh. Thanks. There was another discussion earlier, but may not be able to find it. I will comment there. Carcharoth (talk) 16:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 May 2018

12:40, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my blunder II

Looks like you're experienced at fixing blunders! I was working on the "Brown University Buildings" article and mistakenly pasted into the main "Brown University" article. Thanks for fixing, I didn't realize until the following morning. - Kzirkel (talk) 12:16, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

21:54, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

21:55, 11 June 2018 (UTC)

On the cleanup listing for Wikiproject Jazz, the tables lists over 600 articles that are said to be have dead external links. I've looked at many of these. Many don't have dead external links.
Vmavanti (talk) 23:14, 12 June 2018 (UTC)

@Vmavanti: Example? --Bamyers99 (talk) 23:18, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
@Vmavanti: Check the references sections. Look for [dead link]. --Bamyers99 (talk) 23:40, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
If that's true, then the table on contents on the cleanup page should read something like "Dead References" or "Dead Citations", not "Dead External Links", because a reference is not an external link.
Vmavanti (talk) 23:47, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
@Vmavanti: Many references contain links to external sites. --Bamyers99 (talk) 23:49, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
But in the terminology of Wikipedia, an external link usually refers to the section at the bottom of the page. For example, in the table of contents on the jazz cleanup listing, there is "External link cleanup (2)". That refers to the external link section. The line above it says "Dead external links (653)" although it's apparently referring to references/citations, not the external link section. It's a contradiction. The word "external link" is being used two different ways, one right on top of the other, which makes it even more confusing.
Vmavanti (talk) 23:56, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
@Vmavanti: I have added the name of the template that adds items to the cleanup list to the section titles. "Dead external links {{dead link}}" and "External link cleanup {{external links}}". They will show up in next weeks cleanup run. --Bamyers99 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)

A page that I created, Ontario Peninsula, is apparently listed as belonging in WikiProject Germany, which it obviously shouldn't. I just wanted to let you know about this error so you can correct whatever caused it to prevent future errors like it. Thank you. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 01:27, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

@The Nth User: 1) The article was flagged as potentially being of interest to WP Germany because three German city names appear in the article: Dresden, Hanover, New Hamburg. At the top of the new article list is the "Note: Some articles may not be relevant to this project". The article does not belong to WP Germany. That would only happen if a WP Germany banner was placed on the articles talk page. 2) Articles are removed from the new article list after 2 weeks. 3) I have updated the WP Germany new article matching rules to not match if the word Ontario is found in the article. --Bamyers99 (talk) 15:58, 18 June 2018 (UTC)
It might be a better idea to only disqualify specific mentions rather than the entire article if the word Ontario appears. All of the cities in the table are linked, so it should be relatively easy for the program to figure out whether each individual use of the word Hanover refers to Hanover, Lower Saxony or Hanover, Ontario and have it only count the uses that refer to the former. If having the word Ontario anywhere prevents it from being marked as of potential interest to WikiProject Germany, then a lot of legitimate Germany-related articles, like German cities and towns that have a twin city in Ontario, would be missed. Care to differ or discuss with me? The Nth User 19:54, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

21:47, 18 June 2018 (UTC)

23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

00:46, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

23:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)

I randomly came by Template:Miss Mexico and Template:Nuestra Belleza México, and saw they are not in Wikipedia:Database reports/Invalid Navbar links. I don't know why. PrimeHunter (talk) 13:28, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

@PrimeHunter: I fixed a bug and reran the report. --Bamyers99 (talk) 20:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)

Template parameters / TemplateData utility

Hi. How does your TemplateData error report count the number of transclusions? This link says {{BS-map}} has 875 transclusions, but templatecount says it has 5,809.

Also, is it possible to manually make your tool generate data for templates? I've just added TemplateData to {{Rail color box}} and it would be nice if there were a way to do so. Jc86035 (talk) 13:58, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

@Jc86035: 1) I have added a section to the tool documentation explaining transclusion reporting. 2) The tool is not designed to manually generate data. --Bamyers99 (talk) 16:02, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

16:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)