Jump to content

User talk:Bamyers99/Archive 13

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 10Archive 11Archive 12Archive 13Archive 14Archive 15Archive 20

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Bhutan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

20:41, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Minor problem with InceptionBot's new article's listing

It's not major, but as a regular reviewer of User:AlexNewArtBot/PolandSearchResult I've noteded that the bot will do the following:

  • if an article is created from a redirect, it will list the original creator of a redirect as the author instead of the editor who expanded it. It will also use the redirect date as the article creation date. Ex. for Radivilias it listed the article as "created by Renate on 3 July".
  • it will also produce false positives (list stuff that is not new). It lists articles that were undeleted as new, I think. Or maybe it gets confused when some revisions are deleted? Also, I think it lists articles that were moved to draft and then moved back or such, when old names are delated as erroneous? I will try to report exact diff for that error later when I see those types of errors again. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:31, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
PS. Got some more of those specific errors. 1) Friedrich Nietzsche is listed as started on 2020-07-19 by ClueBot NG. 2) Shaft mining is listed as created on 2020-07-18 by Wiki13. Think we can teach the bot to spot them? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 05:46, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
@Piotrus: I have made 2 fixes to InceptionBot. 1) It will now use the newer user/date info when the redirect creation and the page expansion happen within 14 days of each other. 2) It will now check for a Rollback tag along with the Removed redirect tag and ignore it if the Rollback tag is present. --Bamyers99 (talk) 20:05, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank you! Btw, I have suggestions for overall improvement:

  • can we color-code (like light beige/blue/green) non-article-spaces? As in, drafts could be beige, categories could be light blue, templates could be light green, etc. I also don't understand how the article 'score' is calculated (I find the new pages count much more useful). Maybe flag articles in the mainspace by users with new pages (1) count as light red? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 04:28, 22 July 2020 (UTC)
@Piotrus: Color coding for non-article-spaces is available by customizing your wikipedia skin, see User:AlexNewArtBot#List display personalization. Scoring is explained in User:AlexNewArtBot#Create the rules. The new pages count is only for the last 14 days. --Bamyers99 (talk) 13:40, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Note the bot is still reporting moves as new articles ex Bryan Reynolds (scholar). Anything we can do here? --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 03:53, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

@Piotrus: This was another scenario that was unaccounted for: Old page moved followed by new page created over the redirect. This has been fixed. --Bamyers99 (talk) 18:00, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

Found another false positive, report for April Fools' Day being a new article... (Recent blanking in history?) Likely the same issue as with another false listing for LGBT-free zone --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:17, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

@Piotrus: It now also ignores if the Undo tag is found along with the Removed redirect. --Bamyers99 (talk) 14:40, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

17:58, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 August 2020

20:08, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

15:59, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Bamyers99, Hope you are doing good and fine, Kindly I want to say that you removed my external link which i think is not spammy as it is totally related to the topic and is of good quality. I contributed to the content & got removed. I think this is not fair. I will wait for your reply. Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by WaqasKhan33 (talkcontribs) 07:25, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

@WaqasKhan33: I see nothing on the electricaleyes website indicating that an authoritative institution or organization is responsible for the content. --Bamyers99 (talk) 14:38, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

16:18, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

"Template:Campaignbox assassinations Northern Ireland Troules" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Template:Campaignbox assassinations Northern Ireland Troules. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 14#Template:Campaignbox assassinations Northern Ireland Troules until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Bsherr (talk) 23:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

21:26, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Cleanup worklist does not include incomplete citations?

Sweet potato mild mottle virus is listed here under the "citation needed" category, which is fine, but the citation needed is listed as the only issue present. The article also has some references tagged as "full citation needed", category here. Is this type of issue supposed to be included in the cleanup listing? Velayinosu (talk) 00:42, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

@Velayinosu: "incomplete citations" have been added to the bot. They will show up after the bot runs next Tuesday. --Bamyers99 (talk) 01:07, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Another one I found that doesn't seem to be included is the citation overkill/excessive citations category. Velayinosu (talk) 01:27, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
@Velayinosu: I don't know if that category is needed given the small number of usages. --Bamyers99 (talk) 01:32, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
There's a category called "Accuracy disputes or self-published" that the bot currently includes but it does not seem to pick up these articles. The Sweet potato mild mottle virus article has one source tagged like that. Are these meant to be included or are they a separate category? Velayinosu (talk) 02:19, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
@Velayinosu: It looks like I knew about this category change to {{Self-published}} but only partially implemented a fix. I have fixed it for next Tuesdays run. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:36, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 September 2020

21:23, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

A goat for you!

goat me all day

Specialtasker (talk) 23:19, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

16:24, 5 October 2020 (UTC)

15:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

User:AlexNewArtBot/LGBTSearchResult feedback

Hi. A number of footballer articles are showing up in the list. I presume because they mention Dykehead, Scotland. Could regex's or search rules be changed to keep that entire word out since it's a place and not an identity? Here's an example: John_Waugh_(footballer,_born_1889). Thanks for your consideration. Alison9 (talk) 23:13, 15 October 2020 (UTC)

@Alison9: Rules have been updated to exclude Dykehead. --Bamyers99 (talk) 23:23, 15 October 2020 (UTC)
@Bamyers99: Thank you! Alison9 (talk) 13:18, 16 October 2020 (UTC)

16:30, 19 October 2020 (UTC)

17:37, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 1 November 2020

16:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

15:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)

15:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Recovered Links, Mike Bianchi

Hi, Earlier this evening, I tagged a n external link, as being dead on the BLP of Mike Bianchi. It's on my watchlist, so I was alerted that you recovered data, that apparently, I caused to be deleted. I didn't intentionally do any deletions, but I see in the page history, I must have caused deletions, they were all highlighted in red. I wonder if you have any insight into how I caused it. I'm fairly new here and this is really confusing to me. FYI, I used the visual editor, because I don't know how to tag it in source editing, could that be the problem? I think I may have caused the same issue with other articles. =-O If I am causing issues, I want to learn how to stop doing this. Thanks, in advance, for any help you might be able to offer. Best-Mollifiednow (talk) 01:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

@Mollifiednow: Ya, it's probably a Visual Editor quirk/bug. There is no point in my reporting it to the Visual Editor developers as they will just mark it as unreproducible and ignore it. --Bamyers99 (talk) 01:23, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick response! Ok, I will try to be more careful. I appreciate your help :-) Mollifiednow (talk) 01:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

I just went to the article and looked at how to add in source mode. New addition to my cheat sheet :) Problem solved. Thanks again! Mollifiednow (talk) 01:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

17:17, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 November 2020

17:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

16:14, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

21:33, 14 December 2020 (UTC)

CleanupWorklistBot and BLPs

Hi,

Once again, thank you for creating and maintaining CleanupWorklistBot, it is the cleanup tool!

Would you consider indicating which articles in the listing are BLPs?

I'm writing this fresh from this finding, where a hoax statement in a BLP remained undetected for more than 13 years, during which time it was tagged with {{citation needed}} for more than 7 years. In all these years, I spent many hours going through the WikiProject Croatia cleanup list, and other editors certainly did so too, but apparently it went under the radar for all of us. Apart from the "Unreferenced BLPs" section, currently there is no way to indicate or prioritize BLP issues in the listing. I think I'll use Quarry specifically for the BLPs, so the above is just an idea that may or may not be useful to other editors. GregorB (talk) 13:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

@GregorB: BLPs are now marked with (BLP) after the title. They are also listed in a new section after the 'Changes since last update'. See Croatia.html#Biographies of living persons --Bamyers99 (talk) 15:00, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
A great solution, thanks! GregorB (talk) 15:05, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

20:52, 21 December 2020 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 December 2020