User talk:Balaam's Miracle

Automatapedia?

Hi Balaam, is the Automatapedia project that we were working on a few years ago still being updated? --Idont Havaname (Talk) 19:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't know what will happen to Automatapedia. A while ago i've suffered a complete and utter burnout, combined with a depression and a mental breakdown, resulting in possible permanent damage to my ability to take on responsibilities, including using email, believe it or not. It was very ugly and violent and as a result, i had to immediately put down all of my activities. I still have my faith, but i can no longer do anything that i used to love to do with the intensity like i used to.

--Balaam's Miracle (talk) 15:00, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's sad to hear! I've been praying for you today. Praise God that you have kept the faith. That shows that it's real! --Idont Havaname (Talk) 15:02, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bethany Mota may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

first [[haul video]] was in June 2009<ref>{{cite web|last1=Mota|first1=Bethany|title=First Video :) Mac and Sephora Haul.|url=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0wCoXVkjGA|website=Youtube|date=2009-06-

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:20, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Canon of Amsterdam, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Penitentiary and Artis. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Canon of Amsterdam for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Canon of Amsterdam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canon of Amsterdam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:17, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canon of Amsterdam has been nominated for discussion

Category:Canon of Amsterdam, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]