Jump to content

User talk:BakwasNaKarBay

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, BakwasNaKarBay, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Beeblebrox (talk) 20:56, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automatic invitation to visit WP:Teahouse sent by HostBot

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi BakwasNaKarBay! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ff

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BakwasNaKarBay (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

What is sock puppetry? And who is imtitanum? I don't get it. A lot of people use this IP and I just can't understand why my account has been blocked. That too indefinitely. It's ridiculous. BakwasNaKarBay (talk) 15:39, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry is creating accounts for the wrong reasons, such as evading blocks. You appear to have done this with an account called BakwaasNaKarr even if you might not be Imtitanium - which I do consider you are. Peridon (talk) 18:10, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

eee

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BakwasNaKarBay (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Just read the sockpuppet thing. Multiple accounts are allowed but not for vandalism right? Look at my edit history, when have I done anything wrong? If I have then put forward evidence. Had I known having two accounts was a crime here I wouldn't have made the other one. I didn't even know what sockpuppetry is until you told me about it. Please give me the benefit of doubt and unblock. I really want to contribute. BakwasNaKarBay (talk) 19:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Multiple accounts are allowed but not for vandalism right? " Uh, not exactly ... — Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

xdd

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BakwasNaKarBay (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am being extremely honest with you. I do not know who this imtitanum is. This is a shared IP. And we use proxy server to use it. There are around 50 students using this IP address. Out of these 50 a few must be wiki users. I have no clue how to find this wikipedia user who has been banned for God knows what. Account creation has been blocked for our IP. Why are you punishing us just 'cause someone used our IP? I don't get it. I went to the neighbour hostel to check if they were able to edit the wiki and they were so I created an account from there and began editing. All of my edits are contructive and I assume good faith. Check for yourself. Then I got to know that having multiple accounts is not allowed and the IP for that hostel too got blocked. This is unfair to all of us. Why must the actions of one be the reason for others' ban? What is exactly my fault? Is living in the same hostel as the vandal also make me a culprit? Why are you making it so hard for us contributor to use wikipedia? --BakwasNaKarBay (talk) 07:32, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Living in the same hostel doesn't make you a culprit. Being the culprit is a different matter. I am not going to go into why we know that you are you, but we have very good reasons. Peridon (talk) 09:56, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.