User talk:Bakchod baba

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Mfield (Oi!) 05:25, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bakchod baba (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Bakchod_Baba (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

"Bakchod" is an Indian Slang for the word 'senseless' and therefore is not offensive in any way shape or form.

Decline reason:

I'm not sure about the username, and if that were the only issue then I would consult the blocking administrator about it. However, your editing has consisted of adding unsourced unexplained and potentially libellous accusations against a living person. Unless you can give us an unambiguous assurance that you will not continue to do that, you are unlikely to be unblocked. I suggest you look at the policy on biographies of living persons and at the guideline on reliable sources if you are considering making another unblock request. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:38, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesBWatson: I assure you that I will never ever vandalise Wikipedia pages again as I have learned how inappropriate and immature this kind of act is and I have also realised how wrong I was for seeking a few laughs by making unverified claims on other people. Bakchod baba (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it has taken me a couple of days to get round to answering. On the basis of the assurance you have given, I am willing to give you another chance. However, there is still the username issue. I have consulted the blocking administrator, and if he or she is willing to let you keep your username then I will unblock you. However, you may like to offer another username, to avoid any problems at all. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 10:33, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It seems that more than one editor complained because they regarded your username as offensive. I suggest that you make another unblock request, offering another username. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 18:21, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Bakchod baba (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Polite Name (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

for some reason my last username was offensive. Bakchod baba (talk) 19:25, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Accept reason:

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Daniel Case (talk) 20:25, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When you were unblocked to allow you to request a change of username, you were told "Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking". After well over two months, you have not done so, so the block will be restored. If you wish to edit, please make a new unblock request, and this time post a request for change of username promptly. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]