Jump to content

User talk:Baileyryane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hi wasssssuuupp bro Jessicaferman (talk) 14:38, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

HolaBaileyryane (talk) 14:41, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Baileyryane, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft notes

[edit]

Hi Baileyryane, which article will the draft be added to? It looks like it's going to be to the Me Too movement, however the draft is heavily about another, separate movement, Not Guilty. An article should really only be about the main topic, which is the Me Too movement in specific, so something like this would be a topic to cover in a separate article. There aren't any true connections between the two groups other than they both deal with rape and use hashtags. I'm concerned that some of the ways you connect the two could be seen as original research. For example, in one section you discuss Kesha and Not Guilty, however the article you use doesn't mention Not Guilty at all. There are also concerns of tone, as the draft does read very favorably towards Not Guilty and the article needs to be neutrally written. It's not that the average person would disagree with raising awareness of sexual assaults, it's just that the article has to be neutral. As it's currently written the content would very likely be removed from the article under concerns of original research and tone.

My recommendation would be to work on the article's tone and instead turn the draft into an article on the Not Guilty movement. I am somewhat concerned about the movement's notability, but I don't think that it would really work in the main article for the Me Too movement. I will say, however, that it would be worthwhile to post on the Me Too article's talk page and ask about whether or not there should be a subsection that gives a very general overview of similar campaigns. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:08, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]