User talk:Baileehall
Welcome!
|
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Baileehall, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]Hi, Baileehall -- welcome to Wikipedia! As Ian mentioned, the Teahouse is a great resource for new editors. But did you know that Wikipedia also has an extensive help library for common questions? Of course, if you run into a question or problem, you're always welcome to get in touch with me either by email or on my talk page. Happy editing! Fraudoktorkatie (talk) 14:38, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello!
[edit]Hi Baileehall,
I am also in IAH 209 and I was having some trouble responding to the Talk Page, but it is clear now! I am looking forward to becoming more familiar with Wikipedia and editing the pages and responding to Talk pages. --Devours2 (talk) 21:20, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
February 2016
[edit] Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Your recent talk page comments on Talk:Seat belt were not added to the bottom of the page. New discussion page messages and topics should always be added to the bottom. Your message may have been moved by another user. In the future you can use the "New section" link in the top right. For more details see the talk page guidelines. Thank you. Reify-tech (talk) 04:20, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hi Bailee! I thought that the statistics in the first paragraph were really interesting, but I was a little confused at the end where you gave us statistics on the users wearing a two-point and three-point safety belt, but no statistics on users not wearing a belt at all. Everything else about that paragraph sounds great but that might need some cleaning up! I thought it was really cool that you added in the Restraint Systems Evaluation Program, I’m surprised that program wasn’t already mentioned in the article and I think that it is an important program to add in to your article. I also think it’s great that you tied in human cadavers to your research, considering that is what our course is all about. The rest of your article draft flows nicely and contains lots of important information, which will make the article on seat belts sound even better.
Good luck!
Karlee Bednarowski Karraebed —Preceding undated comment added 04:07, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
Peer Review
[edit]Hi Baliee! I really liked how much data you put in your article. So well thought out and so much content. Right off the first paragraph starts off with very informative information. I can tell what this article is about right by the first paragraph which is really good. The article is also very well cited and pulled in from a variety sources. What confused me is that there are actually might be too many statistics. They just seem too much in the article. Some changes I would suggest is to clean up the transitions and content a bit. I find it very nice how you tied in the class to this article. Including the study of cadavers to seat belts.nguye432
Good Luck!