User talk:CadCossie

Hello, Cosmonarium, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 20:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment, or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 15:50, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just wanted to see what this particular one generates. Not the warm friendly reminder, I'd hoped, sorry about that. Usedtobecool ^TALK ✨ 15:52, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, and it’s fine. will try to do that from now on! Baba pajero pvp (talk) 16:15, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redlinks

Hi, just a heads-up that it is not a good idea to remove redlinks indiscriminately. If a redlinked word might plausibly link to a future article that just hasn't been created yet, it shouldn't be removed. More information here. Thanks! --bonadea contributions talk 15:53, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

im so sorry, i come from a wiki where it is a practiced culture to remove all of them my sincere apologies one again, have a nice day Baba pajero pvp (talk) 16:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No need to apologise - it was clearly a good-faith error, and it's true that it can be rather confusing to go from one Wikipedia version to another one. I only pointed it out because you were removing redlinks in several articles, and it's better that you find out sooner rather than later. Happy editing! --bonadea contributions talk 18:09, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Baba pajero pvp! You created a thread called title edits at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I've indefinitely blocked you for vandalizing articles while logged out. (I strongly suspect you have used other registered accounts.) See WP:GAB for your appeal rights.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:57, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

When will the block end?

Do I have to appeal it or will it go by time? Also, I do not have am aleternate account. CadCossie (talk) 18:12, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CadCossie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am incredibly sorry for my disruptive edits and policy-breaking behaviour on Wikipedia. It was a terrible choice to vandalize while logged out and ruin the quality of this website. If I get unblocked, I will try my best to make constructive edits to Wikipedia. Please consider unblocking me.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time as this is a sockpuppetry and/or checkuser block. Check users have access to technical and personally identifying information they may not disclose openly on Wikipedia. Please read and heed the relevant sections of the WP:GAB. If this is not your original account, you will need to appeal at your original account. -- Deep fried okra 20:14, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Bbb23: Sorry for the triple post, it was lag. Tagging you for attention. CadCossie (talk) 16:38, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I need help please, I have never committed sockpuppetry, how do I prove it? @Deepfriedokra: