User talk:Baba1031

September 2022

Hello, I'm C1K98V. I noticed that you recently removed content from Wikipedia:WikiProject India/New articles without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. C1K98V ^{(💬 ✒️ 📂)} 17:38, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/New articles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 03:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Wikipedia:WikiProject India/New articles, you may be blocked from editing. Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 05:53, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:WikiProject India/New articles. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 04:28, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can't mistake future so please unblock Baba1031 (talk) 14:52, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subodh haritwal

National spokesperson Indian youth congress @Subodh haritwal Baba1031 (talk) 05:57, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Politician Baba1031 (talk) 08:39, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Add politician Baba1031 (talk) 04:39, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baba1031 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i make good article i cant mistake future this article is very important

Decline reason:

Sorry, but it appears you lack the competence required to edit the English language Wikipedia. My guess is that you are not editing in your native language. I suggest you look at Wikipedia:List of Wikipedias, and see if there is a Wikipedia in your native language. The block is for the English language Wikipedia only, and you are free to edit your native language Wikipedia. PhilKnight (talk) 12:11, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

"

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Help:I_have_been_blocked#:~:text=%7B%7Bunblock%7Cyour%20reason%20here%7D%7D

I can't do anything related mistake on future Baba1031 (talk) 14:51, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanjeev rajpurohit (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MarcGarver was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sanjeev rajpurohit and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MarcGarver (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Baba1031! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarcGarver (talk) 13:44, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Baba1031, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GPL93 (talk) 17:07, 27 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:14, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Subodh haritwal Raipur

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Subodh haritwal Raipur has been deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. As the page met any of these strictly-defined criteria, it was deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been deleted are:

It seemed to be unambiguous advertising which only promoted a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to have been fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appeared to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EvergreenFir (talk) 05:23, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baba1031 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Baba1031 (talk) 07:31, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Your reason here" is not a reason to unblock you. Please read the unblock appeals guide to learn how to craft a request likely to be accepted. 331dot (talk) 08:46, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Baba1031 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Baba1031 (talk) 14:33, 28 September 2022 (UTC) i am very sorry i don't know how my account block please unblock my account i can't future mitake[reply]

Decline reason:

Sorry, but you clearly don't have the competence in English to edit English Wikipedia. Please take a look at m:List of Wikipedias and edit the version of Wikipedia in your native language. There's nothing special about English Wikipedia; it's not the "prestige version" of Wikipedia. If your English skills improve, please request that your talk page access be restored via WP:UTRS. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

UTRS appeal #64304

is closed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 06:56, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]